Winter Tour; Wallabies v France Wednesday 7 July, Brisbane

[Dctarget]

Which backrower comes off? Philip for Swain, Wilson for Naisarani?

I wonder about Philip & Hooper’s 80 minute fitness after their season away from chasing Damien McKenzie.

 

[Derpus]

Can't see Hooper coming off. Wilson you'd think.

Maybe he's planning on rotating the halves next match and we'll see McDermott and JOC (James O'Connor) starting together.

 

[Dctarget]

I’m feeling confident and thinking this will be our biggest win with us having the more settled team. 10+

 

[dru]

Can't see Hooper coming off. Wilson you'd think.

Maybe he's planning on rotating the halves next match and we'll see McDermott and JOC (James O'Connor) starting together.

I'd have thought that if JOC (James O'Connor) was available for Test #2 he'd be available here. Rotation could be Tate-To'omua or Tate-Hodge (yikes)?

 

[Zero_Cool]

Willson or Valetini. Likely Wilson he tends to come off for the Reds, but with a big lack of locks and a glut of back rowers, I think there is a non-zero chance both Isi and Swain play lock (or Wilson/Valetini move up into the second row).

 

[Braveheart81]

Hooper certainly hasn't been an 80 minute player over in Japan due to the international rules but it's hard to imagine he's not still incredibly fit.

With no reserve 7 the plan will certainly be for him to play 80.

 

[eastman]

You’d lose that argument.

You reckon? Who started the majority of games for the Brumbies?

 

[Brumby Runner]

Gordon missed a substantial chunk of the season with injury but has been pretty excellent otherwise.

I don't think you can reasonably say his form doesn't make him deserving of selection. If Rennie had him as second choice last year behind White I don't think there's any reason why his view would have changed based on this season.

Just for balance, Jake missed some tackles in those last couple of games. His defence on occasions was as poor as Nawaqanitawasi's. I reckon Tate can count himself extremely unlucky if he misses the starting side.

 

[Brumby Runner]

Like Rob Simmons, people will be complaining that he's a plodder as he's racking up his 100th test.

He is a plodder but imo a lot more deserving of 100 tests than the other.

 

[Brumby Jack]

Couple of comments from Rennie:

• O'Connor didn't respond to treatment as quickly as hoped so wasn't considered for this Test
• Hodge short of match fitness
• Gordon picked on his core skills but expects McDermott to be good against a tiring pack with his pace

 

[Tex]

McDermott on in the 65th minute against the big boppers will be grand.

 

[Brumby Runner]

Gordon isn't the conservative box-kicking machine that people are alluding to here. He made his career as a ball- running scrum-half since he first arrived from club land and still shows that in the rare instances he's behind a pack with any kind of ascendancy.

Not sure I'd agree about Gordon e-man. Tate is a better ball runner than Jake. I reckon Jake's strength is his support play.

 

[Joe Blow]

Which backrower comes off? Philip for Swain, Wilson for Naisarani?

I wonder about Philip & Hooper’s 80 minute fitness after their season away from chasing Damien McKenzie.

I’d guess that Rennie tells Valetini to go pedal to the metal for 60 and then throws Isi in to finish off.

 

[Juan Cote]

Looking forward to Darcy Swain's contribution as I thought he really improved during Super rugby's various versions. Athletic player who seems to enjoy the hard stuff.

 

[Zero_Cool]

The annoying thing with Hodge is he's not match fit, but also not in the 23.

I think (hope) we'll have JOC (James O'Connor) & Tate starting game 2.

I expect it'll be Wilson who goes pedal to the metal, as he normally doesn't go the full 80, but Rob does sometimes disappear so could go either way.

 

[eastman]

Not sure I'd agree about Gordon e-man. Tate is a better ball runner than Jake. I reckon Jake's strength is his support play.

Agreed - I'm not suggesting he's as dynamic or dangerous as Tate but he's not just a pass/ box-kick robot either.

 

[wamberal]

Not sure I'd agree about Gordon e-man. Tate is a better ball runner than Jake. I reckon Jake's strength is his support play.

He has also been around the rugby block a few times. I would much prefer to see Tate on the bench at this stage of his career. His day will come, soon enough.

 

[eastman]

He is a plodder but imo a lot more deserving of 100 tests than the other.

Hodge has his purpose but ideally you'd never want him starting in a Wallabies side.

A good metric for the improvement of Australian rugby would actually be how regularly we aren't forced to select him!

 

[Brumby Runner]

On Hodge, his Wallaby future probably rests on how well Kellaway goes. Kellaway has the all round, versatile game to challenge Reece for the No 23 spot, and is probably a more skillful player.

 

[KOB1987]

On Hodge, his Wallaby future probably rests on how well Kellaway goes. Kellaway has the all round, versatile game to challenge Reece for the No 23 spot, and is probably a more skillful player.

Given Banks hasn’t really nailed down the 15 jersey, I’m wondering if it’s actually his spot he’s challenging for, not Hodge’s.