Are they really that bad? Take a breath, move on and enjoy the rugby.
Has anyone seen the Kearns clip in response to kiwis rubbishing his commentary on the weekend? Funny man.
Because now he can drum up a bit of outrage with this clip, get even more clicks on foxsports and justify his salary and position for next contract negotiation.Yeah, Kearns seems to have decided to make it a bit personal there. Not sure why he can't just admit he got carried away (as all fans do), and on reflection, it was an unfair comment.
Guess not in his nature to do that though!
Man's a knob, embarrassing.Has anyone seen the Kearns clip in response to kiwis rubbishing his commentary on the weekend? Funny man.
Been watching a lot of baseball and hockey up here in Vancouver. The commentators to a tee are professional, knowledgeable, and have pretty good personalities to boot. Each teams local guys though can get a wee bit excited if there team scores, but other than that usually remain pretty objective.
The one thing I have noticed is that no matter how wrong an umpire or refs decision may be, they remain totally professional about it. Yesterday in a Blue Jays Vs Boston baseball game, the ump had an absolute clanger of a call. It went to revision, nothing changed. The commentators and studio people later merely called it interesting and a little perplexing, but that was it. Didn't stop Mrs Bing ranting about it though.
One other quick note, NHL and recently MLB refer all revisions to a central 'TMO' which I think is in New York for both. Entirely fair, no home town TMO to bitch at. In baseball there is an MLB boffin comes out with headsets for two umpires, and they listen to the decision made in New York. It'd never happen in rugby, but pretty good for fans here.
I have no problem with refs getting called out on a bad performance. In this case Kearns is just having a sook. The Tahs weren't good enough.
Spot on Ruggo. Phil should be the commentary guru on scrum and line out issues. Instead, he simply says what we have already seen on our screens. He should be a lot more informative - rugby viewers would love it.
The former pro often usually knows what they are talking about too.Rugby Union needs to look to the NFL on how to provide high quality sports commentating.
NFL likes to operate in set pairs or trios for the duration of the season, the primary commentator is usually someone with no background in playing the NFL with the secondary commentator been a former player. The sideline commentator is again typically someone who has no background in playing the game professionally.
So basically, rugby needs more professional sports commentators and not just former players..
The former pro often usually knows what they are talking about too.
Jokes aside the way they can identify the key move/play in the line of scrimmage seconds after the live action is a massive contrast with our commentators silence at scrum time as an example
Rugby Union needs to look to the NFL on how to provide high quality sports commentating.
NFL likes to operate in set pairs or trios for the duration of the season, the primary commentator is usually someone with no background in playing the NFL with the secondary commentator been a former player. The sideline commentator is again typically someone who has no background in playing the game professionally.
So basically, rugby needs more professional sports commentators and not just former players..