The criticism relates to the University being a tax payer funded institution. Therefore there is an unfair advantage. No other club can offer the same program or facilities but a tiny part of everyones taxes can go to maintaining their dominance over all other clubs.
I acknowledge that Uni is taxpayer funded (but that is not their sole funding source), but is the Uni Rugby club taxpayer funded??
I may be wrong but not all Uni rugby players are at Uni receiving full fee free scholarships for their education.
Like many of the private school "scholarships", many of the supposed full fee free scholarships for the select few Uni players are funded through second party organisations associated with the Uni Rugby Club. In this instance there would be little or no taxpayer funds "misdirected" to the rugby programme.
I am sure that the other "benefits" of Uni are not provided free of charge to the Uni Rugby Club. I reckon that the University Accountants are applying a full "user pays" philosophy to balance their books in relation to services provided to sporting associations on campus.
Like all clubs, Uni Rugby club would have a fair amount of outgoings related to maintaining their infrastructure and overheads (grounds, training equipment, gym, physio, medical, coaches, player payments etc).
I would be most surprised if the University Administrators and Senate allowed one extra schekel of their budget (I am told that well over half the budget to run Sydney Uni comes from sources other than taxpayers) to be "misappropriated" by the rugby club.