This is the exact reason why rugby is failing.
Netball, soccer, domestic cricket. Ice hockey. Basketball just to name a few have all learned the lessons and cut the sentimental ties and faced reality.
Rugby is right now - and it's hard for many to let go if the past amateur ways. But it's either oblivion or get with the times. Sports need money to stay alive so you need a professional component to generate revenue directly or indirectly. Lets see what we choose.
Can you be a little more specific? I did not say that we do not need a professional component, did I?
The point I was making is that right now, and for the forseeable future, the very existence of the game depends totally on the volunteers and others who love the game. That is what I was referring to when I talked about amateurism.
If these idiots in Melbourne think that the game of rugby owes them anything, they are deluded.
Yes, it would be wonderful if we had a big new source of revenue. But where will it come from?
And in the meantime, while we wait for an answer, the amateurs will keep the grassroots going, just as they always have. Those of us who love the game will eat shite and put up with the slings and arrows that go with the territory of being a minor game in this country for the forseeable future.
A domestic competition that saves us is a pipe dream. The NRL and AFL competitions both originated from city competitions, Sydney and Melbourne respectively. Because of those origins, with many decades of tradition, their expanded competitions retained the tribal element that some talk of. A significant number of their teams are part of folklore.
None of our domestic clubs are. Okay, maybe Randwick, that's about it.
The A-League is based on a sport which does have a lot of grassroots popularity, and the ethnic rivalries that gave its domestic contests a bit of spice have been kind of retained, albeit changed a lot.
To sum up, for a professional domestic rugby competition to go anywhere, it would have to be based on 10 or 12 most traditional and recognisable clubs. The others, their players and their supporters, would presumably just fade away into the sunset.
It might be viable as a stand-alone entity, but it is mind-boggling to think that it would generate much excess revenue. And, by the way, the chosen clubs would still rely heavily on volunteers at all levels, amateurism in action.