Like that option and I would definitely go to games and jBring the Japanese Top 5 teams to Australia for a short, sharp bubble tournament.
Moana Pasifika & Fiji edging closer to inclusion in Super Rugby from 2022:
https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby...nclusion-as-nz-rugby-shares-broadcast-revenue
I really think RA need to continue with Super Rugby AU for at least another 5 years in order to safeguard and build fan engagement before moving to a full TT comp. The TT concept they have at the moment is just right for now. Aus teams and fans need more wins, and more good news stories, at Super Rugby level.
I fear that if Aus fans experience 2 or 3 losses per weekend in a full TT comp, Super Rugby will begin it's slow death spiral again like old Super Rugby. Just give the current model at least 5 years to see how it goes first.
Only change I would make is Fiji in Super Rugby AU and Moana Pasifika in Super Rugby Ao, with the current TT concept. That would give every team 8 home games and 8 away games. Perfect.
First few rounds of Super AU this year have had horrible attendances. Worse than Super 15 had pre-covid. Is there enough there to build on?
I don't think you can compare attendances at the moment.
1) Stadium capacity is reduced
2) Western Force games were sold out at reduced capacity
3) Tahs played at Bankwest on a Friday night, never going to draw numbers.
4) People are still reluctant to gather in big crowds, there is a element of fear around at the moment.
I am not quite sure how it is planned yet RN and must admit I haven't asked my scource . But I would assume if the full TT comp is going, the plan would be a one round comp between all? Personally what I prefer, like the original super 12. If NZR are indeed putting in money I wouldn't think it be as simple as having a team set up in each country as many assumed.So is this assumed full trans Tasman and not super rugby Au and nz separate competitions first with follow up separate trans Tasman competition afterwards like planned for this year?
I am nervous how this might pan out as continue to be concerned what is best for the competition vs what is best for nz (replace with australia as well depending on your views) won’t align and latter will win out more then the former. Like to be wrong on that of course
I really think RA need to continue with Super Rugby AU for at least another 5 years in order to safeguard and build fan engagement before moving to a full TT comp. The TT concept they have at the moment is just right for now. Aus teams and fans need more wins, and more good news stories, at Super Rugby level.
I fear that if Aus fans experience 2 or 3 losses per weekend in a full TT comp, Super Rugby will begin it's slow death spiral again like old Super Rugby. Just give the current model at least 5 years to see how it goes first.
Only change I would make is Fiji in Super Rugby AU and Moana Pasifika in Super Rugby Ao, with the current TT concept. That would give every team 8 home games and 8 away games. Perfect.
Bring the Japanese Top 5 teams to Australia for a short, sharp bubble tournament.
World Rugby to stream Super Rugby AU in UK/Ireland and other markets
https://www.world.rugby/news/622772...am-super-rugby-au-for-free-in-key-territories
World Rugby to stream Super Rugby AU in UK/Ireland and other markets
https://www.world.rugby/news/622772...am-super-rugby-au-for-free-in-key-territories
For free as well. Bit of a fuck you to RugbyPass no?
Different business models for both I guess, World Rugby have been building a streaming presence for years with the HSBC 7s, so maybe they see it as an opportunity for both.
For free as well. Bit of a fuck you to RugbyPass no?
Different business models for both I guess, World Rugby have been building a streaming presence for years with the HSBC 7s, so maybe they see it as an opportunity for both.
Trans-Jap competition?