Lack of a trans Tasman tournament for next year is ridiculous, NZRU need to pull their head out and start working together with their partners..
I reckon the franchises just play hardball with player salaries. Cut the fuck out of them - accept you'll lose a chunk and work with what's left. No cutting any teams.Um I would love to see TT next year, but don't RA have to decide how many teams they can afford etc( well according to Hamish on TV)? I know NZ franchises have been getting stuck into NZR saying they need clarity on what is being played next year, for sponsors etc. NZR have made it clear that they want some kind of crossover with Aus if it can be worked. I not sure why you not going crook at RA for not having anything in place as yet.
I reckon the franchises just play hardball with player salaries. Cut the fuck out of them - accept you'll lose a chunk and work with what's left. No cutting any teams.
It would help if NZRU and RA could agree on a salary cap to be shared between the teams (and would be even better if players were free to move around - though this'll never happen), but not mandatory.
I was reading about how prior to the RWC Rassie took the SA model (which was what ours is now) and completely reshaped it. Cut local salaries, particularly to star players, and opened up selection from Europe (if Rugby keeps going down it's current path this is inevitable for both NZ and Aus anyway - maybe not for another 10 or 20 years, but eventually).
He basically said it's better to pay more players, that they can condition and coach, less individually than try and compete with European salaries (which are based on loss making private ownership models- anyway).
Just copy that.
Edit: or get this mythical PE involvement happening. Seems like a pipe dream to me though.
Um I would love to see TT next year, but don't RA have to decide how many teams they can afford etc( well according to Hamish on TV)? I know NZ franchises have been getting stuck into NZR saying they need clarity on what is being played next year, for sponsors etc. NZR have made it clear that they want some kind of crossover with Aus if it can be worked. I not sure why you not going crook at RA for not having anything in place as yet.
“I played club when I was 14 and, when I was 15, I picked rep league instead of rep rugby, I had to pick one. I got picked in the nationals there.
“Rugby is harder, you have to wait longer for your opportunity, whereas league I was 15 and got picked up.
“I know some of my [rugby] mates were the best in New Zealand and they still haven’t been given a crack and they are 20 or 21 and still waiting their turn.”
Brown said the chance to travel the globe was another benefit of union.
“Just in terms of travelling, in the NRL you don’t get as much," he said. “Rugby is pretty cool. That’s one thing I enjoy most about rugby, it’s the teams they play against, like England and South Africa.
“When you play in South Africa you learn about South Africa, same with [other countries] … Doing the haka, all that stuff is awesome.
“[I’ll consider it] down the track. I’ve got three more years here. I just want to focus on that and when the time comes I’ll be ready [to make a decision].”
^ Love to know who his best in NZ mates who're now 20/ 21 & still waiting their turn are, clearly the franchise academy not to mention national age group scouts have dropped the ball big-time.
Nah It’s irrelevant, Australia will have 5 teams next year and both organisations can plan a for a Trans Tasman tournament post the domestic leg. That’s something they can take to the broadcasters right now and offer as a value add proposition to the broadcast agreement negotiations and re-negotiations.
Australia have said they’re happy to host all the kiwi teams to make it happen, and said they’re happy to work with New Zealand to make it happen, Hamish has said he doesn’t understand why it’s not getting discussed from NZRU further. It’s surely in the best interest of both unions.
Not irrelevant? Hamish (you know the chairman of RA) said last week Australia will have 5 teams IF THEY CAN AFFORD THEM. And of course he would say he happy to host all kiwi teams, but as I have said repeatedly Hamish is a public relations man, and says an awful lot that he knows is never going to happen. Hell he knows NZ teams have got no reason or desire to be hosted here, and if you read what's happening NZR have said after they announced the 5 team comp, and are working towards a post domestic comp, if travel allows (and RA wants). See I am sure Hamish knows all this, but he still can make statements that make it look like he only one working towards it and he find plenty believe him. It's a great trick, you ignore everything else being said and done and make statements that your supporters want, and presto, they don't always have to be completely right or true, if you make enough people will believe what they want and forget all the ones that haven't come true. We have a President in USA who does same thing and he knows it works too.
The Bledisloe is already pretty much irrelevant. Just a matter of time till SA join the 6 nations.
What do NZR gain by bringing RA to its knees? They need Australia strong just to have someone to play against.
Because I think NZR view Australian rugby as being strong with 3 well supported teams in a TT competition of there design.
^ Love to know who his best in NZ mates who're now 20/ 21 & still waiting their turn are, clearly the franchise academy not to mention national age group scouts have dropped the ball big-time.
The Bledisloe is already pretty much irrelevant. Just a matter of time till SA join the 6 nations.
What do NZR gain by bringing RA to its knees? They need Australia strong just to have someone to play against.
Opportunity meaning starting spots in Super Rugby.
Rude.You jokers really seem to live in a dream world sometimes, I will bet anything I got that NZR have absolutely no intention and never have of bringing RA to it's knees. They also have to protect NZ rugby, and signing up to whatever the next plan that comes along without knowing if RA has got the finance etc to actually do it would be beyond stupidity. It is in NZR's interest to have Australia as a vibrant and strong partner/competitor, but not at the risk of weakening NZ rugby, anymore than RA would want to weaken the game more than it is here.