• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

Where to for Super Rugby?

Status
Not open for further replies.

liquor box

Peter Sullivan (51)
So you believe that a similar black and white interpretation would work in, say, 'a Bledisloe?

no, Higgers deserved a red by the rules on the weekend but some after reading the same rules say it was a yellow.

People then complained that at 10 minutes into a game it should not be a red which sounds like the time on the clock is used as a factor.

If the Higgers incident occurred in a Bledisloe is would be controversial
 

dru

David Wilson (68)
no, Higgers deserved a red by the rules on the weekend but some after reading the same rules say it was a yellow.

People then complained that at 10 minutes into a game it should not be a red which sounds like the time on the clock is used as a factor.

If the Higgers incident occurred in a Bledisloe is would be controversial

WOuldn't the controversy be how the muppet left his team mates in a hole?
 

Sully

Tim Horan (67)
Staff member
The thing that annoys me about the process the refs use is when the say get to the no arms bit and the say 'no he didn't use his arms' and I can clearly see his other arm around the players back. And his left arm is coming up to rap around his front and that's the arm he uses to slam him to the ground.
Yes first contact was to his head, yes he should have been carded, but surely saying no arms is outright wrong.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
 

Sully

Tim Horan (67)
Staff member
WOuldn't the controversy be how the muppet left his team mates in a hole?
Enough. We won't be calling players derogatory names any longer.
Everyone can continue at there own risk. But I will be policing it from now on.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
 

zer0

John Thornett (49)
Enough. We won't be calling players derogatory names any longer.
Everyone can continue at there own risk. But I will be policing it from now on.


What about The Shambles (TM)? They'll be excluded, Shirley? If not, might as well just ban myself and Dismal. Preferably before they conspire to lose, at home, to whatever 23 blokes the Chiefs managed to round up at the Huntly Mongrel Mob chapter whilst on their drive up to Auckland.
 

Sully

Tim Horan (67)
Staff member
What about The Shambles (TM)? They'll be excluded, Shirley? If not, might as well just ban myself and Dismal. Preferably before they conspire to lose, at home, to whatever 23 blokes the Chiefs managed to round up at the Huntly Mongrel Mob chapter whilst on their drive up to Auckland.
That's an entire team not an individual. Could be okay.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
 

Dismal Pillock

Michael Lynagh (62)
Enough. We won't be calling players derogatory names any longer.
wtf_zpscbdlxcmf.gif

Enough. We won't be calling players derogatory names any longer.

trayspill_zpsw1zqoyyv.gif

Enough. We won't be calling players derogatory names any longer.

birthdaygif_zpse83b4990.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top