Sure, off the top of my head....
Peter Kimlin
Saia Fainga'a
Anthony Fainga'a
Guy Shepherdson just misses out....*
There's about 10-11 local products in the current Brumbies squad (plus a few others elsewhere), after what was probably a decline in recent years.
I don't particularly take too much stock, as long as we're producing test quality players... I don't care where they come from although would like to see more locals make the step up.
But the point is you accused the Brumbies of pinching all their talent from Qld/NSW as if the Force or Rebels weren't equally as guilty.
*3/4 of those players helped the Reds win their first Super Rugby title - lousy poachers!
So three average Wallabies in the last decade while supposedly being a stronghold of Australian rugby. They have been around for ages and if this is their potential then it's not much to stake an argument on.
I never implied the Force and Rebels aren't as guilty(keeping in mind they are much younger clubs with developing junior systems unlike the Brumbies who have peaked). What I said was that the ACT doesn't have the same potential as West Australia and Victoria. That's just demographics.
What are the Brumbies providing Aus rugby besides a coaching system which is transferable, that isn't overshadowed by the potential of the much bigger regions that are on the chopping block?
It sucks any team has to go but the "history" argument doesn't wash when they still aren't contributing and have reached their potential.