Very good game to watch. Both teams came to play, and the referee facilitated an open, expansive match.
I was very worried about this match. The Force has been a bogey team for the Crusaders since their inception, always lifting when they play us. Last night was no different, and despite the Crusaders scoring 5 tries to two, the Force were well and truly in this game until late in the match.
I thought there were some genuine positive for the Crusaders. The play of their outside backs was scintillating at times. Dagg was in devastating form early, and despite a couple of lste errors Guildford was excellent and continues his good form since returning from injury. SBW showed a degree of maturity that I haven't seen from him. His defensive work was first class and he looked very dangerous at times with ball in hand. The Crusaders scrum took longer han I expected to gain a level of dominance, but the late win against the Force feed was very important. I was also very impressed with Todd, whose linking and ball running late in the game helped the Crusaders score their two late tries. IMO Todd was the standout loose forward on display, which is a testament to him as he was the only uncapped loosie who played.
There were some worrying aspects about the Crusaders play as well. Their kickoff reception was dire, turning over possession multiple times when recieving kickoffs. And I'm still worried about the direction and composure of Berquist and Fotuali'i. Kahn in particular seems to have only one speed at which he can play, manic. At times he and Berquist needed to slow the match down and play for territory rather than look to fling the ball wide from deep within their own half. I'm not sure if the Crusaders halves were playing to instruction, or playing to instruction. But the Crusaders historical success has been built on playing smart, structured rugby, not headless chickens footy. Berquist has a good kicking game, and should use it more often to take pressure off his team.