Rugbynutter39
Michael Lynagh (62)
No I think the article was written in incredibly poor taste as to crow about how $70m could have saved RA from perils of Coronavirus is just bad taste.
Only point I do agree with perhaps is jumping to the gun crucifying forcefan intentions posting the article.
So will delete that post but definitely won’t delete my comments on what I stand by is gutter journalism.
So save the uppercuts for yourself. I certainly will be no longer supporting rapid rugby if they stand by and show support for that article in the tone it was written.
Not the time or place for that sort of cocky arrogance and telling RA it could have been saved from the coronovirus pain by accepting twiggy money as no one ever would have predicted the events unfolding and article is insensitive to lots of pain and hardship endured by many in society including professional sport.
Writing that force wont have to make any cuts is fine but to imply RAs predicament is all down to not accepting twiggy money is a complete disgrace
Only point I do agree with perhaps is jumping to the gun crucifying forcefan intentions posting the article.
So will delete that post but definitely won’t delete my comments on what I stand by is gutter journalism.
So save the uppercuts for yourself. I certainly will be no longer supporting rapid rugby if they stand by and show support for that article in the tone it was written.
Not the time or place for that sort of cocky arrogance and telling RA it could have been saved from the coronovirus pain by accepting twiggy money as no one ever would have predicted the events unfolding and article is insensitive to lots of pain and hardship endured by many in society including professional sport.
Writing that force wont have to make any cuts is fine but to imply RAs predicament is all down to not accepting twiggy money is a complete disgrace