M
There is also this
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/spo...a-force-for-good/story-e6frg7o6-1226695209134
so who knows
I would say the ARU the forces offer would change but he is prob trying to show the ARU he is still worth a huge top up contractwith whom?
Perhaps he is thinking if he holds off and plays well in the two games against the AB's he will have a bit of added bargaining power to negotiate a bigger contract?
What bargaining power could he possibly have? No one wants him but the Force.
He always has the option to walk away from the Force offer and ply his trade overseas (Europe/Japan). A couple of great games against the AB's would remind a few teams, hey this kid can play and he is only 23 lets take a punt on him.
Its all total speculation of course and he may have just realised after a bit of talking down from senior Wallabies that he needs to be 100% focused on his committment to the Wallabies for this series.
he is waiting on the ARUHas Cummins re-signed yet? I thought his contract negotiations were also dragging on?
Possible Force backline. Looking quite dangerous
9. Alby Matthewson
10. Zack holmes/ Saias Ebersohn
11. JOC (James O'Connor)
12. Kyle godwin
13. Marcel Brache? (maybe Rasolea. he has potential)
14. Nick Cummins
15. Luke Morahan
21.Ian Prior
22. Dane Haylett-Petty
23.Jayden Hayward
There is some talk over in the East that Hugh Roach has signed or is going to sign with the Force on the back of his cameo guest appearance with the Force vs B&I Lions.
Any truth to the rumour?
Possible Force backline. Looking quite dangerous
9. Alby Matthewson
10. Zack holmes/ Saias Ebersohn
11. JOC (James O'Connor)
12. Kyle godwin
13. Marcel Brache? (maybe Rasolea. he has potential)
14. Nick Cummins
15. Luke Morahan
21.Ian Prior
22. Dane Haylett-Petty
23.Jayden Hayward
Who isn't to say that Foley changes the risk averse game plan due to the backline composition? There's certainly a handful more quality players that might lend itself to a 'smart, creative, running rugby' gameplan.Does the composition of the backline matter if Foley continues to play the risk averse game? Is he planning to move on from what we saw this year? I felt that the game plan this year was basically Tahs lite, ie the plan played at the Tahs without the pack selected and honed for three years to produce that plan.