BDA
Jim Lenehan (48)
I sorry mate, I have to disagree about Tahs beating an understrength Crusader's team, they simply beat the Crusaders, and to say the Crusaders were understrength is to perhaps hint at not enough credit to Tahs! They were bloody good!
I can't think of any Crusader's players that were available that would of made a huge difference. Tahs won that in forwards where they basically just belted the Crusaders at the breakdown, that not taking away from Tahs' backs either.
Very good performance and shows that a large part of rugby is the yop 10% and just mentally tearing into it!
No i agree. you might have misinterepted the point i was trying to make...my point was that while some kiwi or aussie fans might try to downplay the importance of the win because the crusaders "rested players", to me its the fact that they rested players and were well outplayed that really encapsulates the improvement in the tahs (and the aussie conference in general). They underestimated the tahs and in years past they would have gotten away with benching a few big names. Certainly not this year.I sorry mate, I have to disagree about Tahs beating an understrength Crusader's team, they simply beat the Crusaders, and to say the Crusaders were understrength is to perhaps hint at not enough credit to Tahs! They were bloody good!
I can't think of any Crusader's players that were available that would of made a huge difference. Tahs won that in forwards where they basically just belted the Crusaders at the breakdown, that not taking away from Tahs' backs either.
Very good performance and shows that a large part of rugby is the yop 10% and just mentally tearing into it!
Last edited: