Ruggo
Mark Ella (57)
I will agree that Beale was not the problem but I take great exception to him being named best on ground in what was a bit of a flogging.
Somebody was flogging to give him man of the match..
I will agree that Beale was not the problem but I take great exception to him being named best on ground in what was a bit of a flogging.
They still would have won without those Stormers tries against the run of play from poor handling and dumb turnovers.Disagree. It wasn't just a lack of grunt, but grunt was most definitely lacking. Few forwards came from any depth on the ball, too flat-footed and upright. That's a lack of grunt.
Agree 100% about the poor skill level and execution.
A lot of the turnovers were the result of aggressive Stormers' defence. Passes were pushed by many (not just Foley) trying to beat the defensive line when they were getting no penetration. Too high risk from many players when they just didn't have the platform to allow it. They should have done better, but the Stormers' defence cannot be under-estimated in these errors. I don't see individuals to blame, but a whole team pretty much. As we've seen with other teams (Reds, Brumbies, Force etc..) the playmakers look poor when the front-foot ball is not being created - they end up too deep, too static with no big bodies getting forward.They still would have won without those Stormers tries against the run of play from poor handling and dumb turnovers.
Bernard Foley - I'm looking at you.
A bit like this blog really.It's voted by the fans now. On twitter, or some website. A stupid idea which has yielded predictable results.
Disagree. It wasn't just a lack of grunt, but grunt was most definitely lacking. Few forwards came from any depth on the ball, too flat-footed and upright. That's a lack of grunt.
Agree 100% about the poor skill level and execution.
Yes, the Stormers defence was good. But the Tah's also showed no patience and threw plenty away on their own without even needing help from the opposition.A lot of the turnovers were the result of aggressive Stormers' defence. Passes were pushed by many (not just Foley) trying to beat the defensive line when they were getting no penetration.
There's some good logic. We shouldn't criticise one or two individuals because that's unfair, because they were trying, but we should criticise another individual because it's unfair that we don't criticise him enough, and obviously he wasn't trying. Was that what you meant?A bit like this blog really.
If Beale plays well don 't mention him. If he, along with others backs, doesn't win the game pin the blame on him.
Did you notice where Foley was? Yep as usual when we lose he was AWOL, can 't blame him though. Beale and folau where the only waratahs backs who kept trying all night. Funnily enough they made a few mistakes. Better than taking the night off like foley.
Either the people who voted weren't watching the game, or were Stormers fans or are just plain barking mad.
A bit like this blog really.
If Beale plays well don 't mention him. If he, along with others backs, doesn't win the game pin the blame on him.
Did you notice where Foley was? Yep as usual when we lose he was AWOL, can 't blame him though. Beale and folau where the only waratahs backs who kept trying all night. Funnily enough they made a few mistakes. Better than taking the night off like foley.
Cheika summed it up at halftime.
Brumbies summed it up a year ago.
Inside shoulder pressured forces the tahs across field - Beale and if being naturally prone to that anyway.
Stormers happy to use the 16th defender to round up the feeble attempts to go round them.
A big bopper needs to offer himself as an inside option when they find themselves being shepherded across field.
That's about right. I don't agree that Beale was anywhere near MOTM but that conversation on here is always going to degenerate into giving him a pasting. He was far from our worst. FWIW he scored about the same as Fekitoa in the Fantasy Draft game.
For the record the MOTM would be between de Allende and Etzebeth for mine.
Cheika summed it up at halftime.
Brumbies summed it up a year ago.
Inside shoulder pressured forces the tahs across field - Beale and if being naturally prone to that anyway.
Stormers happy to use the 16th defender to round up the feeble attempts to go round them.
A big bopper needs to offer himself as an inside option when they find themselves being shepherded across field.
It's not the first time that the Waratahs structures have gone to pieces when confronted with a flat, rushing defensive line. On the evidence of last night, they seem unable to react to it effectively. Our response is what one normally sees at school or junior level - crab sideways, shuffle the ball on to someone else and push passes in contact in the hope that someone else can make a break.
That was probably the worst game I've seen Foley play, and this is where the selection of Beale at 12 has a cumulative effect. A 5/8 confronted with a rushing defence like that needs a Nathan Grey or a Tom Carter to crash it up, pull in 2 or 3 defenders and still get the ball back. We don't have that option and so Foley is under even more pressure.
Something of a rethink is required after a game like that.