26,000 people, but obviously not Walsh & Ayoub saw arms in the tackle. Just another example of Walsh trying to make himself centre of attention. The reason he didn't give him a yellow after the punch (which he should have), was because 2 yellows = red and a send off and judiciary appearance might have shown the error in the 1st card.
I'm not so sure.
I'm just putting this out there - obviously I'm leaning toward the view the view that Ullugia was guilty:
"(g)
Dangerous charging. A player must not charge or knock down an opponent carrying the ball without trying to grasp that player."
Law 10.4.
The argument supporting Walsh's decision is that Ulugia did not "try to grasp" his opponent.
This style of "tackle" goes unpenalised most of the time on the presumed basis that movement of the arms in the general direction of the ball carrier, as opposed to the arms being braced by the side of the body, resembles an attempt by the tackler to grasp the ball carrier.
Many times, including on Saturday night, that appearance is not matched by a true attempt to grasp him.
I would have been indifferent if nothing had been done about it.
I think the subsequent failure to show Ulugia a 2nd yellow is just evidence of Walsh's reported lack of bottle when it counts.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk