The gave McCauley 4 years.Max Douglas didn’t deserve another contract, I don’t see the issue. Needs to put on more bulk. We punted McCauley so don’t see why Douglas would be any different.
The gave McCauley 4 years.
I think that is the issue, he isn't as good as the above 3 and he ain't going to be the TH lock we needWe need a big TH lock. Douglas isn’t that.
Is he a better lock than Holloway, Hanigan or Sinclair? No. The Tahs are in a title window, there’s no room for Douglas. Simple.
Hopefully he gets game time out west and does well
There's a pretty solid argument that it's better for Douglas to (presumably get paid more to) play in Japan and get more minutes at a higher level than Shute Shield vs being on a cheaper contract at the Waratahs, play next to no Super Rugby and be stuck in club rugby all year.
Hopefully he continues to develop, fills out a bit and comes back in a couple of years. There's no doubt he's got some talent.
my theory is Japan is better for backs (focus on skill and speed) and Europe is better for forwards (set piece and physicality).
I doubt Hocking's game has developed much since his departure because of the above. In fact I think he would have developed quicker here (but not his hip pocket). Douglas is the same.
Is he a better lock than Holloway, Hanigan or Sinclair?Hockings would be the perfect get for the Tahs too.
Is he a better lock than Holloway, Hanigan or Sinclair?
Hockings would be the perfect get for the Tahs too.
I think it was said earlier that Coleman had left him a ridiculously long list of missed calls and messages of which none were returned.I would say that yes, he would be in our best 23 as a genuine big bodied lock.
Was Hockings actually big bodied? he was certainly tall but I remember him being fairly average in contact being fairly young and still on the lighter side.