Hills 57 Kings 17 [Half time 24-3 I think.]
That was an almost unbelievable scoreline but it was a true reflection of the game.
Some thoughts:
• Just about every Hills player was a ball runner or off-loader or facilitator of open rugby in some way. Some of their tries were breathtaking and a joy to watch.
• I eavesdropped on the Kings coach at oranges and he got it right suggesting that they were making Hills look like superstars and correctly telling them how to address the problem. They had to control the turnovers and get them to commit to Kings drives up the middle. Wear them down with structured rugby and get them impatient. Then on Hills ball to knock them over before they got started.
It was good coaching and the Kings lads perked up from the 2nd half kick-off, but at 31-17 the Hills lads put the hammer down and scored 26 unanswered points. Kings couldn't stop the Hills lads from whipping the ball out wide, and once there, stopping the interplay of the Hills' ball runner and his supports. Some of the no-look passing with the body and head square reminded one of the Reds at their best this year.
• It was the first time I had seen Hills in 2011. Their set pieces are not as good as last year and they got free kicked or penalised at a lot of scrums. The Kings' maul was a bit of a mystery to them too. Obviously there were a lot of lads who were mainly league players but one rugby thing they were very good at was earning turnovers. Some guy or guys would keep the Kings runners up and another would rip the ball out, which is illegal in league. They weren't bad when the ball was on the ground either.
• The penalty count was high against Hills and the ref seemed to be coaching them a lot. He did a good job but maybe a yellow card or two could have been appropriate.
• I started jotting down the numbers of the Hills players who were good with the ball and had just about every jersey number down, but the LHP was a standout: big, back fast, and a deft passer.
• Kings seemed to have their best team on the park as the lads looked like the same ones I saw at Joeys on Saturday (there were no programmes). If they were the same then 9. Gregory and 7. Hall can hold their heads up high. In the end Kings looked ragged and were blowing hard.
PS – I hope that it is not inappropriate to say what the Kings coach said, because it described what happened in the first half and it gave credit to the coach.
.