I like to watch
David Codey (61)
yeah sort of it was Hanse, if you actually recalled the evidence of the trial. The devil made him do itYes it was cricket, suprisingly it involved Hanse Cronje, who would have thought he would break the rules???
yeah sort of it was Hanse, if you actually recalled the evidence of the trial. The devil made him do itYes it was cricket, suprisingly it involved Hanse Cronje, who would have thought he would break the rules???
I rekkon the refs should check the headgear before the matches. Considering we dont even have a backline plan at the moment, what would the coaches even have to say?
"Pluy whut's un frunt uf yoo, Guts."?, what would the coaches even have to say?
"Crab, crab, crab, kick pass"
From the other perspective, Il Konzarelli, we have to be cautious about making unsubstantiated allegations, or indeed repeating them on an open forum, especially when it would be illegal under the laws of the game. The OP was stating is as fact; I think it has not to this point been proven to be so.
"Thomas Carter is the best #12 never to have worn a Wallabies jersey"
It's funny but I can't help but feel a bit sorry for him.
I see him in the gym all the time and he works bloody hard and seems like a good bloke (I've been told he's a great guy by others too), just a shame he looks to be missing a bit of creativity in play or something...
On that basis my pedallist friend, this entire forum is fucked. Most of what spouts from the majority of the posters fingers, mine included, could often be taken for statement of fact rather than a matter of opinion. How much fun could our legal friends have by trying to take to task someone who says that "Richard McCaw is the biggest cheat in the modern game", "Thomas Carter is the best #12 never to have worn a Wallabies jersey", "Rob Horne, MMM and Peter Hynes just have temporary niggles" or "Matt Giteau is currently the most underrated back and should be allowed to continue unabated in the Green and Gold for the next two world cups at least"
Do u guys know what it means when somebody pits a smile on their posts?
It's gay code, MajorlyRagerly. It means they're available.
Careful with the gay stuff, Groucho.
You could lose your Louis Vitton sponsorshipand there would be no more silk purses for you, only kangaroo scrotum coin purses.
Careful with the gay stuff, Groucho.
You could lose your Louis Vitton sponsorshipand there would be no more silk purses for you, only kangaroo scrotum coin purses.
Well if you're going to have a gay theme, it's Louis Vuitton, I mean get the sledge right FFS!!