gel
Ken Catchpole (46)
A salient point. It's quite possible.If Cheika had 233 million dollars I don't think he would have changed much, seems like a pretty pig headed guy.
A salient point. It's quite possible.If Cheika had 233 million dollars I don't think he would have changed much, seems like a pretty pig headed guy.
Not holding any silverware.$233M is an astronomical amount of money. I'm having difficulty fathoming that as the budget for a national coach, especially when England have come away from 2019 not holding a lot of sliver ware.
http://www.lassen.co.nz/pickandgo.p...ma=ENG&head=Coaching Record - Eddie Jones#hrh
I don’t want Robertson, like Robbie Deans he has only ever coached in an environment where he has had an enviable level of player depth to call on. Good coach undoubtedly, just not suited for Australian Rugby IMO.
I would prefer Jamie Joseph out of all them, he has now successfully coached two teams with comparatively limited playing depth and resources in their respective comps, what he did with the Highlanders was impressive, and what he did with Japan was even more impressive. It’s like he is perfectly suited to adjust the teams game plan to the resources he has to call on.
If Cheika had 233 million dollars I don't think he would have changed much, seems like a pretty pig headed guy.
If Cheika had 233 million dollars to spend on Australian rugby, Michael Hooper would currently be shopping for his third yacht.
More like we'd be able to pay more than one player market rates.If Cheika had 233 million dollars to spend on Australian rugby, Michael Hooper would currently be shopping for his third yacht.
Whereas Pocock would be on is next sabbatical with the Dalai Lama, before playing somewhere in Asia for mega bucks Hooper at least had the decency to keep turning up
Except that Pocock wasn’t paid by RA for his sabbatical... [/forthe10000000thtime]
Sort of, wasn't he paid higher for the seasons he was "playing" / watching from the sidelines whilst injured
That's great news for JapanIt won't be Jamie Joseph. He's just re-signed with Japan through to the 2023 RWC.
He only signed and was paid for the two years following the sabbatical, and later requested if he could have those payments for the two years spread over three years, which RA agreed to as it benefited both parties...
It won't be Jamie Joseph. He's just re-signed with Japan through to the 2023 RWC.
But was fresh enough to give it a whirl in Japan between land care courses and Super Rugby seasons
I will stick with my version, at least hooper kept fronting up
All things inevitably devolve into either Pocock v Hooper or some shit about Quade.Well then I’m not sure what any of that has to do with the conversation?