How good would it be to have him and Taylor in Australia though.You would go bonkers fixing up all the spelling problems around here.
How good would it be to have him and Taylor in Australia though.You would go bonkers fixing up all the spelling problems around here.
How good would it be to have him and Taylor in Australia though.
Rennie was a very strong candidate for ABs and many people's favourite. I reckon he's a good score for AR and his staunch, no fuckaround manner could be a good fit.
Now the ABs are down to Robertson and foster and if the latter is picked you'll here the screams from this side of the Tasman.
Now we've got a head coach, I'd be interested to hear people's thoughts on the assistants.
I'd go with:
Dave Rennie (Head Coach)
Matt Taylor (Defence)
Scott Wisemantle (Attack)
Laurie Fisher (Forwards)
Mick Byrne (Skills)
Haydn Masters (Strength and Conditioning)
100% would go with this. Some extremely talented and experienced AC coaches both domestically and internationally. I cannot think of a better coaching structure.
Decisive and strong leadership from RA. Who would have thought? Great move.
Only 6 coaches?
Only 6 coaches?
Pfft.
Let's add a kicking coach, mental skills coach, backs coach, kick return coach, box kick chasing coach, team rehab coach, media skills coach, re-starts coach, captain's decision making coach, and laws interpretation coach.
There. A full team plus one reserve.
(Written with equal amounts of sarcasm and wonder.)
Either case is arguably better than paying a $Million bucks a year to a coach whom very few wanted after the first twelve months. The four year term is the only quibble I have with the appointment. If we learnt anything from the last four years, it must be that the coach must be able to be moved on without great cost if the results are not forthcoming.Rennie took himself out of the running for the All Blacks job. I doubt he would have got it but he pretty clearly made a decision to accept the Australian job rather than wait and see on NZ.
I see little point in trying to appoint someone for only two years at this point. The win record after one year would have to be so low to not be offering them a new contract that it probably isn't worth considering. You'd be working on the contract extension before any tests were played in 2021.
If RA wants a contract that is heavily weighted in their favour they either need to pay significantly more for a top coach or settle for a crap coach no one else wants who will take whatever is offered.
If we only offered 2 years i think at the very least he would have held out to see what NZ had to offer.Either case is arguably better than paying a $Million bucks a year to a coach whom very few wanted after the first twelve months. The four year term is the only quibble I have with the appointment. If we learnt anything from the last four years, it must be that the coach must be able to be moved on without great cost if the results are not forthcoming.
I don't think a two year term would have been too hard to sell to Dave, so long as the expectations for the first year were reasonable and clearly stated, ie a rebuilding year with a real expectation of say a 40% winning record but meeting all other requirements in terms of squad and culture building, harmony and player development etc. He is only available around June 2020. Wouldn't be too many top teams in world rugby then interested in his services if RA hadn't stepped in.
I don't think a two year term would have been too hard to sell to Dave, so long as the expectations for the first year were reasonable and clearly stated, ie a rebuilding year with a real expectation of say a 40% winning record but meeting all other requirements in terms of squad and culture building, harmony and player development etc. He is only available around June 2020. Wouldn't be too many top teams in world rugby then interested in his services if RA hadn't stepped in.
If we simply appoint for four years continually, then we could, and probably would, end up in a loop where we never get to break a cycle of less than successful coaches. I simply do not want to see another Cheika-like situation arise where we couldn't afford to discard him, ever again.
Looked at some Kiwi boards and the sentiment seems to be that the NZRFU have missed a trick with all of Schmidt, Gatland, Rennie and JJ out of the running.
Most rate Rennie highly.
Yeah. Next year could be horrible. And we'll need to listen to the tossers on here with their 'I told you so' comments. But Cheika would be lucky to win that many and Larkham would lose an extra one try a driving maul for the final ten minutes.So you pay substantially more to effectively have the chance to start looking for a new coach after one year because you've already decided it's not going to work out.
If we play 14 tests next year, let's say we only win 4 or 5 of them. Not a crazy concept that we could lose twice to Ireland, three times to NZ, twice to the RWC winners, SA and win only 2 of our 4 tests on the EOYT. Should RA be sacking Rennie already?
I see the four year contract as a cost saving because the potential time for sacking them is after the first two years at which time they're either in the back half of the cheaper four year contract or early in the more expensive two year contract heading towards the RWC.