A few selection thoughts:-
--The White v Genia debate seems like a hot topic. White was woefully slow in his delivery on Friday. Really terrible. Genia was just ok i thought, but easily better than White.
I think generally the perceived form of the 9 and 10 of any team rests on how the team is performing. Generally the play-makers have things easier in a team that is performing well and it makes them look better. conversely playmakers in poorly performing teams are generally under pressure and are more likely to look ordinary. I'll temper that point by saying that there is obviously a "chicken or egg" situation, in that the cause of a poorly performing team is often contributed to the pivots, and vice versa.
I think overall White has looked better than Genia this season, no doubt. But he's playing in a team that is performing at a much higher standard. Genia on the other hand has worked hard (without being outstanding) in very hard circumstances. I don't think anyone would attribute the Reds performances down to Genia play; Genia appears to be doing his best behind a poorly performing pack, inside a make-shift 10.
The point I'm making is that saying "White is out performing Genia this season" and thus he should get the RW bench spot, is fraught with danger. Analyzing which player is better equipped for the bench spot is much more complex.
Genia looks to be in better form than he was last year. Hi running game appears to have returned and that is what has always made him such a solid test player in years past, particularly having regard to our style of play. Plus past form at test level definitely has to be a factor. Genia has proven a match winner on several occasions, and he has a bucket load of experience at that level. White has significantly less experience and is yet to really shine on the international stage.
When I take all of those things into account, I still come out with Genia slightly in front, but I'm continuing to watch both players over the next 3 months, and that could definitely change.
-- Also I'm warming to the idea of having Timani as our back-up 6 (behind fardy). I really like what he can bring to that position - size, strength, phyisicality, ballrunning and workrate.
I'm not sold on Higgers. I don't think he would look out of place in the squad, but I think Timani is a better option. Higgers' involvements have been really good this season; he plays with a lot of physicality and speed. But, he doesn't seem to have the workrate of Timani.
My backrows for the RWC if the squad was named tomorrow would be:-
6. Fardy, Timani
7. Pocock, Hooper
8. Palu, McCalman
-- Lock - I have to admit that I was horribly wrong in predicting that Horwill would be the 4th lock in the world cup squad a month ago. He's just not the champion he once was. I'd say Simo and Skelton are locks from my point of view and I believe they should be our starting 4 and 5. We always talk about having a well balanced pack. I don't believe you can get much better balance in the 2nd row than that pairing. As for the other 2, I'd go with Carter and either Coleman or Arnold (both of whom can play the enforcer type role). Carter hasn't been in great form, but i do think he doesn't get the praise he deserves in some games. He's got some test experience and has a great workrate.