Dave Beat
Paul McLean (56)
He's played 6, and 8 before.All good until you get to the line out.
He's played 6, and 8 before.All good until you get to the line out.
He's played 6, and 8 before.
Mighty fine Manly back row there6 is clearly an issue. At 7 we have an embarrassment of riches. There are few sides in the world for whom Gill or Hooper would not be starting (let alone Pocock, when healthy), and obviously that Smith bloke hasn't lost much while eating duck confit and drinking Bordeaux. I've been really impressed with Mowen and I think he deserves a shot, unless Palu comes back firing.
6. Smith
7. Hooper
8. /Palu
After watching Wales v. England, I think it's a fair chance that we'll see 6. Warburton and 7. Tipuric. Smith and Hooper/Gill would not be outmatched physically by such a pairing.
Scotty, like that combo and it is more balanced I know that.If we want smith I would be inclined to go with this as a starting backrow:
6 higgers or mowen
7 smith
8 palu
Palu to go nuts for 50, smith to move to 8, gill or hooper to come off the bench.
Gill has missed a game as well so not 2 less games only one. Hooper and Gill both have good all round games. And Gill can kick off both feet! .Despite missing the opening two rounds, the 32-year-old ex-international is only behind Reds flanker Liam Gill for the most pilfers and turnovers forced in the entire competition after six rounds.
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-union/u...-smith-loan-20130326-2grn8.html#ixzz2Odm27JkM
Stats well not bad and don't lie, them look at the work off the ball, ball in hand, and other skill sets that Gill hasn't yet developed. Gill, Hooper, and Pockock are all very fine players and will benefit from having Smith involved.
Showed Sharpe the door.
Not sure about Smith I think everything was very mutual.
I think he thoroughly deserved to go off shore and play after 110 test, unlike Elsom who went to chase the coin and never really returned to the form prior to his sabbatical.
Gill has missed a game as well so not 2 less games only one. Hooper and Gill both have good all round games. And Gill can kick off both feet! .
The Question is Is Smith so much better than Hooper and Gill that we need to bend rules to get him in the team?
I, for one, wouldn't be breaking rules for him. The guys we have a top quality.
White wants keep Smith with Brumbies
ACT coach Jake White is intent on opening discussions with George Smith's Japanese club.
http://www.canberratimes.com.au/rug...-keep-smith-with-brumbies-20130326-2gsoc.html
Push to let Smith feast on LionsBRUMBIES coach Jake White has begun to pave the way for openside flanker George Smith's return to the Wallabies by looking into extending his loan from Japanese club Suntory.
As I was saying earlier, with typo courtesy of the Canberra Times...
If they can extend the contract then there is no issue regarding eligibility.
If you want to challenge the sense of entitlement across Australian rugby pick mowen and smith.If we want smith I would be inclined to go with this as a starting backrow:
6 higgers or mowen
7 smith
8 palu
Palu to go nuts for 50, smith to move to 8, gill or hooper to come off the bench.
I reckon the best balanced back row we can roll out at this stage would be McMeniman, Smith, Palu.
I reckon the best balanced back row we can roll out at this stage would be McMeniman, Smith, Palu.
Yeah I would also like to see evidence of his mobilityI like it. Would like to see MMM at 6 in super xv though.
Is Palu actually due back anytime soon?