Seeing as the Lions won't play with an out and out groundhog, Deans has to target the breakdown. For this I'd have a specialist 7 on the bench as back up to Pocock.
The last time we had Pocock, Hooper came on 6
Seeing as the Lions won't play with an out and out groundhog, Deans has to target the breakdown. For this I'd have a specialist 7 on the bench as back up to Pocock.
On the Folau debate, I think he would need to be out and out head and shoulders above the nearest other option for whatever position you play him at to be even considered. Even then I have my doubts.
Folau will play for the Tahs against the Lions. You'd expect that will be basically the Lions' 1st team. If he has a cracker he'll be picked for the following week, but I'd expect him to start from the bench.
But BDA he was a "League" winger. This has been more evident than the two skills you mention when he has made errors that if done in a Lions Test would be game over.
Many have immediately discounted Mogg as an option for the Lions Tour simply on inexperience yet Folau is someone we should overlook inadequacies for? That makes zero sense to me.
Mogg has a similar set of attributes. The ability to sniff out a try and solid under the high ball. He also brings years of playing Rugby to the table and a subconscious knowledge of the rules etc yet according to most, he would be too much of a risk/liability in the Wallabies vs Lions. Why?
The way Deans explains the whole George Smith selection issue makes infinitely more sense than what Pulver says."Hopefully we won't need to (investigate his availability further) ... I'd rather chase realities."... "It will give David some respite and not worry about if he gets pulled because he knows he's got someone capable of filling the void if he leaves the ground,''
Read more: http://www.foxsports.com.au/rugby/wallabies/wallabies-coach-robbie-deans-says-veteran-george-smith-isnt-a-reality-for-test-selection/story-e6frf55l-1226592596767#ixzz2Mpszfg9i
Gees, you one eyed Brumby fans (the select few on this forum, not all Brumby fans here by a long shot!) have a magical ability to read what you want from posts, regardless of the actual content! Colour me impressed.
PS What about missed tackles? Tries scored? If Lilo had better than Taps with either either, you would have included them. And that's enough for me on the subject.
What 'errors' are you talking about??
Again what inadequacies are you talking about? lack of experience? personally i dont subscribe to the idea that converting to union is rocket science. Folau has something like 5 trys and 6 try assist in the 4 games he's played for the tahs thus far. He's not exactly a fish out of water. If your talking about things like an understanding of the breakdown and positioning in defence etc, again my view is we should let him play out the season and assess him in May/June
My main point though is that the Lions tour is one for the purists. It's for people who live and breathe rugby.
Absolutely. It's a conundrum. Great opportunity to grow interest but is it worth it if we have to 'sell out' to do it? I'm not sure.I see what you mean, but it's also -- short of a RWC -- the rugby event most likely to draw the interest and eyeballs of casual fans. Purists know why it matters, casual fans (i.e. exactly the people who need to be brought into the tent) get caught up in the hoopla, the hype and, hopefully, some cracking good games.
Yeah I know you hadn't written Mogg off I was just using him as an up and commer that had "done his time" in the sport so to speak that offered similar things to Folau.
The inadequacies and errors aren't numerous but they have been costly at the time. Batting the ball dead in the trials, running sideways and away from support at times, the back pedalling on defence for Ships try etc.
Making the transition from league to Union probably isn't as difficult as some make it out to be. Making the transition from league (albeit State of Origin superstar) to Wallabies vs Lions test player is immensely harder. But yes I am also talking about an understanding of the breakdown and positional play, things that are unique to union. And maybe Mogg had a season to impress and didnt (as subjective as that is) but Izzy won't even have had that.
My main point though is that the Lions tour is one for the purists. It's for people who live and breathe rugby. Folau may become one of them but he's not yet and shouldn't be selected.
Cummins and Shipperly were not broken.
I'm worried the damage could be greater than the reward. If izzy plays then in 2014 goes back to league, I can see the headlines already. Unions so easy Izzy switched over and climbed to the very top of the game in a few short months. Well not quite a headline but you get the gist. ;-) And the players that felt they were close to selection but got overlooked for that last spot that Izzy got? I wouldn't blame them if they chucked the toys out I the cot and went overseas.
I get why there's hype and excitement, I just feel that there's too much at stake to select him.