Sorry I can't help myself replying to this.I was at the game and while the complaints about the referee were certainly evident around me (and online), I really couldn't see a problem with it.
Australia got penalised heavily in the first half when we were constantly under pressure and most of those had to happen, particularly with our ball at the breakdown. They were all pretty clear.
There were several dumb penalties Australia gave away which I can't see any issue with (Kellaway obstructing after the cross field kick, Slipper (I think) picking the ball up from an offside position).
I can't really see a way that the Wallabies could have been penalised less given the way they played.
I would only add that when referees are being critiqued when learning their trade, they are pulled up when they don’t call a penalty or an infringement. So they are always looking for a penalty to be awarded. Letting the game flow is not taught.Sorry I can't help myself replying to this.
Why do rugby supporters critize reffing?
1 Refs are human and can make mistake.
2 Rugby have grey areas and two different opinions can both be right.
3 Reffing is like people's personalities. You,ll never get two persons or two animals that have the same character and refs deciding the same.
So fuck ja, they make mistakes.
The South African players have a huge advantage since playing in the URC. It took our teams half a season to adapt to NH conditions and refs.
Example Adamson is totally different to Berry or to the NZ refs.
So fuck ja iso critizise the ref, what about the professional players adopting to the way the ref reacts or ref? Want to tell me they don't study them?
Just get a grip and critizise when your team lost or blame the stupid players.
I tend to agree. I like Porecki and I think he's an effective Super Rugby Hooker for the Tahs but doesn't offer anything more at the next level. I bet Rennie hope that Latu can have a big year on the field and a quite one off it. I'd let FF (Folau Fainga'a) keep the start for now and get Lonergan on for the last 20-25 mins for the rest of the year.Personally, I don't think Porecki has as much influence on a game as FF (Folau Fainga'a) (Folau Fainga'a) does and is prone to sometimes offering poor ball at lineout time, just like almost every No 2 we've tried in recent times.
It took the SA players half a season to adapt? It only took Rassie 57 minutes to sort out Test refereeing…Sorry I can't help myself replying to this.
Why do rugby supporters critize reffing?
1 Refs are human and can make mistake.
2 Rugby have grey areas and two different opinions can both be right.
3 Reffing is like people's personalities. You,ll never get two persons or two animals that have the same character and refs deciding the same.
So fuck ja, they make mistakes.
The South African players have a huge advantage since playing in the URC. It took our teams half a season to adapt to NH conditions and refs.
Example Adamson is totally different to Berry or to the NZ refs.
So fuck ja iso critizise the ref, what about the professional players adopting to the way the ref reacts or ref? Want to tell me they don't study them?
Just get a grip and critizise when your team lost or blame the stupid players.
Agree. The ref does not decide the game. Sure they make mistakes but none are openly biased to one side or the other.Sorry I can't help myself replying to this.
Why do rugby supporters critize reffing?
1 Refs are human and can make mistake.
2 Rugby have grey areas and two different opinions can both be right.
3 Reffing is like people's personalities. You,ll never get two persons or two animals that have the same character and refs deciding the same.
So fuck ja, they make mistakes.
The South African players have a huge advantage since playing in the URC. It took our teams half a season to adapt to NH conditions and refs.
Example Adamson is totally different to Berry or to the NZ refs.
So fuck ja iso critizise the ref, what about the professional players adopting to the way the ref reacts or ref? Want to tell me they don't study them?
Just get a grip and critizise when your team lost or blame the stupid players.
Ghost, I am hopeful BPA (no I can't spell it) comes in for the NH games. I always thought he was an excellent hooker and mostly threw it in straight.I tend to agree. I like Porecki and I think he's an effective Super Rugby Hooker for the Tahs but doesn't offer anything more at the next level. I bet Rennie hope that Latu can have a big year on the field and a quite one off it. I'd let FF (Folau Fainga'a) (Folau Fainga'a) keep the start for now and get Lonergan on for the last 20-25 mins for the rest of the year.
Forgot about him. Good call. Definitely helped Bordeaux win it all this year.Ghost, I am hopeful BPA (no I can't spell it) comes in for the NH games. I always thought he was an excellent hooker and mostly threw it in straight.
Latu was very good before he left but I haven't seen enough of him since then and his cameo last year didn't show much.
White was getting it from the Boks and their supporters from the get go. He looked rattled and his play reflected it. If we had not had issues with 10 and 12 I am sure that DR would have replaced White early.
I think we lack a bit of professionalism (ie doing the same thing over and over with a continuous high level of skill) and preparing for refs is a part of it. It is up to the captain to shut a player up if they are getting up the ref's nose. That is what Slipper should have done to White. Wouldn't have changed the outcome but?
Ok I like your points, but I still feel that we box kick too often, too poorly, in bad field position, for not enough metres. I understand ‘horses for courses’ but I have seen the Wallabies way to often, from deep in our red zone, box kick and only gain 10-15 metres and Nic White seems to be a guilty culprit more often than not. We are just gifting the ball to the opposition well in our half and having to defend, defend, defend and wondering why we have no territory, no points, and very few wins.The box-kick, per se, is not a low percentage option, hence all good teams do it, a LOT. We do it poorly, in terms of blockers, execution, and chase. So it doesn't yield well for us. We need to get better at it.
Got sucked into playing their game.From Kevin Millar on twitter:
In the first half of the game, of the 40 minutes, the ball was only in play for 14 minutes and 35 seconds. Dire.
18 lineouts took up 13m 51s or 31%.
4 scrums - 5m 40s (12.5%).
3 goal kicks - 5m 40s (12.5%).
2 stoppages (water break & injury when clock was off) - 3m 13s (7%).
3 restart kicks - 1m 40s (4%).
Other - 35s (1%)
From Kevin Millar on twitter:
In the first half of the game, of the 40 minutes, the ball was only in play for 14 minutes and 35 seconds. Dire.
18 lineouts took up 13m 51s or 31%.
4 scrums - 5m 40s (12.5%).
3 goal kicks - 5m 40s (12.5%).
2 stoppages (water break & injury when clock was off) - 3m 13s (7%).
3 restart kicks - 1m 40s (4%).
Other - 35s (1%)
Too true FP. And as much as some here think Nic's box kicks are the pits, he is far and away the best box kicker in the Aussie camp. Trouble is that we hardly contest for the ball in the air, and with Koroibete injured early last game that was in effect the end of our chasing game.Box kicks usually happen between the 22 & half way where you can only kick long or run it back (with the risk that a turn over will have them camped just outside the 22)
A box kick is a wonderful tool when done effectively, it is a contestable kick ie the team needs to contest the bloody thing and create pressure It takes team work and effort