Has there been any word of a citing for the Scot's player or anything?
Very rarely admits to a blatant error*No and I doubt there will be.
World Rugby very rarely cites players who didn't receive a red card.
Gee our attack has been clunky for the past three or four games, hasn't it?
Paisami is solid player who went very well when thrown in against the French and then the ABs in his first year. He has some playmaking skills and can be very damaging in defense. He was far from our worst on the weekend. If anything he tries to do too much. I’d have him before both Foketi and Simone.He's not overrated. He's last man standing. Kerevi is unavailable. Simone is gone. Foketi is just back from injury, originally not slated to tour because of his shoulder. No one on the forums is saying Paisami is the saviour of the Wallabies.
No chance IMHO and he had his chances at test level. Foketi looks good but he has not exactly set the world on fire either. Kerevi is obviously first choice but Paisami is a good back up.Simone never got a fair stab. He was certainly the better player in Super Rugby.
I think Paisami is a pretty solid player, who (as Joe Blow stated) who has obtained a lot of goodwill from a strong series against the French last year, but I question the combination of Foley and Paisami together.No chance IMHO and he had his chances at test level. Foketi looks good but he has not exactly set the world on fire either. Kerevi is obviously first choice but Paisami is a good back up.
Can I give you Swain?? I genuinely think if the citing commisner thinks it a red he will cite.No and I doubt there will be.
World Rugby very rarely cites players who didn't receive a red card.
They said "very rarely".Can I give you Swain?? I genuinely think if the citing commisner thinks it a red he will cite.
Can I give you Swain?? I genuinely think if the citing commisner thinks it a red he will cite.
Glad you know me so well , don't recall ever having met you. In saying I a neutral, I mean it doesn't worry me, when I lived in Aus ,Wallabies were generally my second team, same as Reds (apart from NZ teams) , now I genuinely don't really take sides. And I was a memeber of Reds for a few years etc. Not sure that what got to do with the discussion at hand anyway, but knock yourself out.They said "very rarely".
Not "never does"
While I am here, I'll just make this observation:
You have never been a "neutral" as you claim.
Ok I thought in test matches they were all under control of WR (World Rugby).That wasn't World Rugby.
That was SANZAAR.
Pfitzy; if we protected our ruck ball a LOT better.Watching back the first 10 minutes, we actually looked pretty good for a bunch of players who hadn't played in weeks.
McDermott has a dart. We run a couple from the back rather than just trying to kick it. Off the goal line dropout we made a good attack but didn't support the ruck quickly enough. Some nice, contestable kicks that we profit from by going wide and having Holloway and Hooper run into space.
Sure, it looks much better with Kerevi and Koroibete just smashing blokes out of the way, but it would also look good if we protected our ruck ball a bit better.
Dan: I admire your equanimity. Unfortunately at 75 I still find myself shouting at the TV sometimes. Sad really!Glad you know me so well , don't recall ever having met you. In saying I a neutral, I mean it doesn't worry me, when I lived in Aus ,Wallabies were generally my second team, same as Reds (apart from NZ teams) , now I genuinely don't really take sides. And I was a memeber of Reds for a few years etc. Not sure that what got to do with the discussion at hand anyway, but knock yourself out.
I will add I genuinely watched test on Sunday morning without caring who won.
Mate I actually don't really shout at TV (used to a long time ago), though I admit to applauding a good move or try etc by any team whether it by my team or not, my wife laughs she says they can't hear you!!Dan: I admire your equanimity. Unfortunately at 75 I still find myself shouting at the TV sometimes. Sad really!
Maybe, Simone always played well at Super Rugby level but did not show much with limited test opportunity. Foketi may fair better with more time in the saddle. I think Paisami does offer a bit of a foil to Foley as he does have some playmaking skill(He can leave the grubbers out).I think Paisami is a pretty solid player, who (as Joe Blow stated) who has obtained a lot of goodwill from a strong series against the French last year, but I question the combination of Foley and Paisami together.
Foley's always been pretty limited in ball- playing (although a very dangerous runner and good support player) and looked the best with a creative 12 (KB (Kurtley Beale)) and freak fullback (Folau). I don't think Paisami is skilled to be the ball-player, or big enough to crashballer, that the Wallabies need to overcome the limitations of Foley at fly-half.
I doubt it will happen, but I'd be tempted to give Simone some time against opposition who aren't the All Blacks- he has more nuance in his game.
Hes the future.On another note Nick Frost took a couple of steps forward. Let’s hope that continues
His grubbers behind the line are so very often a genuine chance. There was a period (I think 2021 for the Reds) where he was doing a few too many, but he's reined it in again and they're threatening. Underrated string to his bow imo.I think Paisami does offer a bit of a foil to Foley as he does have some playmaking skill(He can leave the grubbers out).