Surprisingly good team for how many rotations there are. As Reg pointed out to me this isn’t really an ‘A’ team.
Honestly there’s not many positions there that are obviously replacing someone better (who’s also available). Gibbon, Samu, Gordon.
How do they matter? There's literally one day a every 4 years they are used for RWC pool seeding and even then, you're not in control of anyone else's rankings so yours is quite irrelevant for escaping a pool of death. Sponsors care about rankings? You've got to be kidding me.
You have Hanigan in the backrow, so there are plenty of jumping optionsPretty sure Skelton jumps now. Though, yeah, doubt hed be considered a primary target.
Who would you have picked? The players being rested needed a break, IMHO. The players being tested deserve a chance.
Pretty sure Skelton jumps now. Though, yeah, doubt hed be considered a primary target.
Resting Kellaway is interesting. Are they wrapping him in cotton wool as he's next in line for fullback after Campbell?Disappointed Petaia doesn't get a start. Genuine x-factor, even if he has had an indifferent couple of years of form/injury/position swapping. Would have started him ahead of Wright.
Maybe they think Wright actually had a better game last week? Or as Wright is only just back, get him some more game time and rest AK (Andrew Kellaway)?Resting Kellaway is interesting. Are they wrapping him in cotton wool as he's next in line for fullback after Campbell?
I reckon Skelton could win at least one lineout standing at 2, and getting the timing right. He's big enough and strong enough to snaffle the pill. Doesn't need to get off the ground, just needs to get his mitts on the ball.Though it has been suggested that Will might be better suited to lifting one of the smaller back rowers - eg Hooper. Skelton is unlikely to be any faster getting off the ground nor less likely to broadcast it. Doesn't mean he can't be an option, just less likely to be considered a primary jumper.
I kind of agree and think I would have fully been behind this 18 months ago. I'm more keen to see him play 5 games in a row for the Reds. He gets up every time after a tackle like he's been shot. Weve all seen the glimpses of brilliance, but he needs to be a bit more robust.Disappointed Petaia doesn't get a start. Genuine x-factor, even if he has had an indifferent couple of years of form/injury/position swapping. Would have started him ahead of Wright.
I kind of agree and think I would have fully been behind this 18 months ago. I'm more keen to see him play 5 games in a row for the Reds. He gets up every time after a tackle like he's been shot. Weve all seen the glimpses of brilliance, but he needs to be a bit more robust.
Absolutely. Not fussed about having slightly less line out options if we get more front foot ball around the field.I reckon Skelton could win at least one lineout standing at 2, and getting the timing right. He's big enough and strong enough to snaffle the pill. Doesn't need to get off the ground, just needs to get his mitts on the ball.
That's why I'd love to see him play multiple back to back starts for the Reds. Get through them unscathed hopefully and then the injury memories start fading away.You wonder at what stage part of those reactions become habitual, he's had that many injuries and now a few concussions, every time he stands up and feels a bit off, he probably thinks he's on the side-lines again for a month.
The fact that Petaia's coming back from a minor injury is probably a factor in why he's not starting too - on form for Rennie.Disappointed Petaia doesn't get a start. Genuine x-factor, even if he has had an indifferent couple of years of form/injury/position swapping. Would have started him ahead of Wright.