TSR
Andrew Slack (58)
Given his work rate, I thought maybe he spent a couple of hours on the gates before kick offHe counted them in an instant.
Given his work rate, I thought maybe he spent a couple of hours on the gates before kick offHe counted them in an instant.
I think the framework dictates red card at the top end for leading with an elbow like that with contact to head / neck, but can be mitigated depending upon when the elbow is raised (pre or during / post contact). Surprising it wasn't at least looked at, given the ref and AR were within a few metres of it.
Surprised as well they didn’t look at it.
But I thought the contact was chest without a raised elbow (it was pointing downwards) and then his arms were lifted whilst in contact to shrug Tate off/ backwards rather than a strike.
But who knows.
Mate, If Tate had tackled the guy properly it would of been a non issue. Instead he went for a front on ball and all tackle and got owned.
If the French captain had palmed off Koroibete, Marika wouldn’t have been red carded. Very strange argument, what happened happened and that’s what should have being adjudicated on.Mate, If Tate had tackled the guy properly it would of been a non issue. Instead he went for a front on ball and all tackle and got owned.
If the French captain had palmed off Koroibete, Marika wouldn’t have been red carded. Very strange argument, what happened happened and that’s what should have being adjudicated on.
Was that Naisarani's last game?
Why would it be?
All these guys are contracted until the end of the year unless we release them.
Can't imagine Rennie will be releasing Naisarani, BPA or Koroibete early.
Your argument is that because Tate could have made a more effective tackle (in your mind at least) then the contact to the head is null and void. Using that logic, because the French captain could have made a more effective carry then Koroibete should not have been carded.Not strange at all. If Koroibete had the ball and made the same run and contact, no card,
Your argument is that because Tate could have made a more effective tackle (in your mind at least) then the contact to the head is null and void. Using that logic, because the French captain could have made a more effective carry then Koroibete should not have been carded.
Who gave away the last penalty against the wallabies??
It was a pretty tough call. Philip and Uelese pushed right over the top of him clearing out.Think it was Valetini - not releasing. He carried it in and still had it when the whistle was blown. Ref pointed to Philip though but he never had the ball.
Oh ok, a bit “and if my grandma had wheels she’d be a bike” then, since the efficacy of the tackle is a separate conversation to the legality of the fend, but play on I guess.Don’t think he’s commenting on the contact at all. Just saying if he’d made a better tackle we wouldn’t be having the discussion.
I tend to agree. Tate planted, stopped and waited for the contact. And got munted.
That close to the line you want to be driving forward in the tackle.
It was a pretty tough call. Philip and Uelese pushed right over the top of him clearing out.