Must have been watching a different game as I thought Petaia was very good and don’t get why you would put Wright ahead of him on that game
Runs: K: 11; P: 6
Run m: K: 91; P: 68
Passes: K: 5; P: 8
Clean Breaks: K: 3; P: 1
Defenders beaten: K: 8; P: 3
Tackles: K: 2; P: 2
Tackles missed: K: 1; P: 0
Turnovers conceded: K: 1; P:1
You'd need different metric to compare Wright given time on the field but I'd say all three look promising. I don't place Petaia far behind Kellaway (who I like a lot), if at all, and agree with Rennie's apparent assessment putting Wright behind Petaia.
It isn't really apples for apples though. Both Kellaway and Wright really will compete over similar placement in the squad - Kellaway will be selected over Wright at this stage. Petaia is one of those players whose skillsets means they may try to find a place for him in the 23 somewhere, but where it is may well depend on how his reliability is going and where the strengths/weaknesses lie in the back line. With Koroibete available it probably means Petaia wears 22. When he (Koroibete) is out he (Petaia) may well start at wing ahead of Wright, pretty much every time. And of course the discussion changes should Petaia get a shot at FB.
Petaia easily showed last night why he is considered like that. Trying to dismiss him by a single metric "Kellaway > Wright > Petaia" is one dimensional.