This question was asked earlier, but I don't think anyone answered, so I assume the answer is no. But could Sio play both sides? If not, then I think he should get the LH in front of Robinson. Robinson is very good but Sio was the form prop of the S15. Our problem is at TH where both Alexander and Slipper are similar in being ok scrummagers and astounding athletes around the field. And Kepu who is a slightly better scrummager but maybe not quite as physical. If Sio could play both sides I'd actually demote him to the bench and start with Alexander (or Slipper) because of their physicality and all round play. If the scrum was dominated, like happened in the third Lions, then Sio could come on early at TH.
Moore should be our hooker. I am a big fan of TPN, but I'd say most people agree that Moore is the better player and that the justification for TPN starting, or at least everyone's justification of Deans starting with TPN was that if he came on as a replacement he was just as likely to knock himself out a minute later so it made more sense to bring him on first where he could be replaced if that happened. But honestly, you start the first 60 minutes with your best player.
Fardy number 4. Between him, Kimlin, Moore, Smith and Alexander (and Mowen), I can't remember any time that a scrum half got as clean ball from the ruck as White had. They gave away penalties in the process, but often I was astounded that, as tag-team, they could secure such clean ball without breaching illegality. I'll probably make a dill of myself by saying this but I've never seen it done so well in over a decade of watching rugby, even by the Crusaders!