Scott,
are there any stats that support Quade as being the logical choice at 10?
It would be interesting to see what the data suggests.
It appears we all have preconceived ideas about him.I doubt his performances this year have changed anyone's mind,either in the affirmative or the negative.
No. can't offer any stats that say Quade is the logical choice. He's behind on try assists, line breaks, turnovers and tackles completed and Reds are behind on tries scored. He's only ahead on offloads.
Reds attack isn't firing and the blame gets laid with QC (Quade Cooper) (and any other #10) when that happens.
OC (and any #10) needs the ball less so he can sit back behind the forwards and pounce only when space opens up - at the moment he's having to try and make the space.
QC (Quade Cooper)'s been stepping up to take the ball more trying to make something happen as the Reds forwards haven't been doing the work required in attack.
As an example he passed the ball in the two matches on the SA tour 44% more than the average for all matches before those this season.
Only time the Reds forwards have played their part in attack recently was the first half of the Sharks game and that allowed QC (Quade Cooper) to be so much more effective. The next best performance by the Reds forwards was the match against the Chiefs.
In both of those matches QC (Quade Cooper) had his lowest number of involvements (kicks / passes / runs) for the season so far.
So those stats help understand what's going wrong but unless the Reds forwards put it right in the next two matches QC (Quade Cooper) is no chance of selection (not that I think he is going to be selected anyway).