• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

Wallabies 2025

A mutterer

Chilla Wilson (44)
I don't think there are guarantees for most players with a new coach coming on board tbh. Don't really buy that as a reason to go overseas, but obviously makes the decision a lot easier to justify taking the big pay check....
Really? I think well above 60% would be locked in atm.
 

Strewthcobber

David Codey (61)
as a fan I want players that back themselves to make it it in any environment. The lack of confidence is a red flag for me

I don't think there are guarantees for most players with a new coach coming on board tbh. Don't really buy that as a reason to go overseas, but obviously makes the decision a lot easier to justify taking the big pay check....
I don't think he's looking for a guarantee.

More like, are you going to consider me for selection like the current coach, or not consider me for selection like the previous coach.

Of course there would also be differences in the offer from RA with input from the coach as well, if one was appointed. This is the uncertainty
 

Major Tom

Watty Friend (18)
Strewth, the kid is 25 with competition for his spot only just starting to heat up. This was a very honest comment from Noah which I do like, but it revealed a lot of insecurity. Anyways, it’ll be interesting if Schmidt picks if he can’t improve his form.
 

Braveheart81

Will Genia (78)
Staff member
Also, I don't really understand the logic of holding it against him or it being a sign of insecurity. If you're choosing between two options and the one which pays you significantly less also comes with substantially more uncertainty then why would you choose that option?

It's perfectly reasonable in my view to put some weight towards that uncertainty. If I'm going to opt for the substantially less lucrative role then I want as much clarity over what that looks like as possible.
 

Major Tom

Watty Friend (18)
Also, I don't really understand the logic of holding it against him or it being a sign of insecurity. If you're choosing between two options and the one which pays you significantly less also comes with substantially more uncertainty then why would you choose that option?

It's perfectly reasonable in my view to put some weight towards that uncertainty. If I'm going to opt for the substantially less lucrative role then I want as much clarity over what that looks like as possible.
I understand going to Japan. He’s get more money than what RA could give him. That makes complete sense. But he’s making it sound like he wouldn’t have a shot without Schmidt. I think that’s an odd thing to say. And if you’re saying that publicly, the message for me is that you’re not competitive and confident to back your skillset to be selected. It’s not a mindset of a winner in my books. He shouldn’t have a mortgage on the no. 10 atm he hasn’t done enough. Look I know I’m probably reading too much into a couple of lines of what he said. But to me, whilst they were refreshingly honest they also revealed a player not completely prepared to prove to the next coach that they are absolutely the best person to direct the backline. And I don’t reckon the next coach is going to consider him as a OS player after that comment.
I wish him the best and hope he comes back a better player.
 

TSR

Steve Williams (59)
I understand no player is given or should expect a guarantee, and that coaches can’t be influenced by sentiment, but his treatment by Rennie at first then by Jones does seem to have been pretty brutal. Personally I don’t blame him for being a bit jaded with the prospect of going through it again.
 

Derpus

Phil Waugh (73)
Want player? pay money. can't pay money? no player.

It's weird when people try to suggest players shouldn't pursue the maximum amount of compensation they can for their work given that concept is basically the foundation of modern western civilisation.

I'm always mildly surprised when players actually do forgo hundreds of thousands of dollars for the chance to play for the Wallabies. Wallabies aren't even good.
 

Tomthumb

Peter Fenwicke (45)
Want player? pay money. can't pay money? no player.

It's weird when people try to suggest players shouldn't pursue the maximum amount of compensation they can for their work given that concept is basically the foundation of modern western civilisation.

I'm always mildly surprised when players actually do forgo hundreds of thousands of dollars for the chance to play for the Wallabies. Wallabies aren't even good.
Would be far more fulfilling to show your grandkids your Wallabies memorabilia then to show them a yen note
 

Ignoto

Peter Sullivan (51)
All I’m saying is it was an odd comment to make about why you’re exiting the Australian system. It was honest but didn’t come across as a very resilient response to me.
I think you're being considerably unfair to Noah about this being a decent reason.

There's a saying going around; "People Don’t Leave Bad Jobs, They Leave Bad Bosses" which I would imagine resonates with Noah. I'm not saying Joe and Co are bad "bosses" or coaches, but the saying demonstrates the impact your boss has on whether you're happy with your job.

Extending that to Noah's situation, I can imagine the unknown and length of unknown plays a bit on your mind on whether you want to stay around. It's certainly not much asking for wanting clarity on what your career may look like and who is going to have a big say in shaping that career.

If you've ever had a good boss leaves, it really feels like a gut punch, all the momentum and energy the team may have had gets sucked out of the environment and you question whether you should stick around.
 

Major Tom

Watty Friend (18)
I think you're being considerably unfair to Noah about this being a decent reason.

There's a saying going around; "People Don’t Leave Bad Jobs, They Leave Bad Bosses" which I would imagine resonates with Noah. I'm not saying Joe and Co are bad "bosses" or coaches, but the saying demonstrates the impact your boss has on whether you're happy with your job.

Extending that to Noah's situation, I can imagine the unknown and length of unknown plays a bit on your mind on whether you want to stay around. It's certainly not much asking for wanting clarity on what your career may look like and who is going to have a big say in shaping that career.

If you've ever had a good boss leaves, it really feels like a gut punch, all the momentum and energy the team may have had gets sucked out of the environment and you question whether you should stick around.
Hang on. Who’s to say the next boss in charge won’t be as good or better for Noah? We think it’s going to be Les right? I think he’s going to be pretty fair and balanced to all wallabies players. Joe will still likely be involved in a consultation role anyways. He’s going mainly for the money which he’s entitled to, but he made it sound like he’s playing for Joe rather than playing for his country more. *I’m not suggesting he doesn’t want to play of his country.
Playing test footy is the pinnacle. I personally think the wallabies need players willing to push themselves and others at the risk that they may miss out on selection. I laud what McReight has done and he our best 7 atm. But if it’s better for the wallabies that Tizzano is picked due to form or injury then so be it.
Anyways, I think Noah won’t really get to the world quality standard, I reckon Lynagh already does what he does with a bigger boot that’s more suited to test rugby and he’s only 21. He’ll get better.
 

Braveheart81

Will Genia (78)
Staff member
Hang on. Who’s to say the next boss in charge won’t be as good or better for Noah?

No one. When you don't know who that person is though and you need to make a decision it's going to have an impact on that decision.

When the other option comes with a lot more money you're going to want to know as much info as possible about the likely outcome if you do opt for the path that involves a lot less money.
 

Slim 293

George Smith (75)
Would be far more fulfilling to show your grandkids your Wallabies memorabilia then to show them a yen note

How much Wallabies' memorabilia can you lay down for a mortgage these days?

I'm not sure why you'd hang onto a Yen note to show your grandkids...
 

TSR

Steve Williams (59)
Want player? pay money. can't pay money? no player.

It's weird when people try to suggest players shouldn't pursue the maximum amount of compensation they can for their work given that concept is basically the foundation of modern western civilisation.

I'm always mildly surprised when players actually do forgo hundreds of thousands of dollars for the chance to play for the Wallabies. Wallabies aren't even good.
I’m guessing a number of reasons -
- despite your thoughts on the Wallabies for a lot of these players it’s a life long dream
- they are competitive guys and selection provides validation
- people stay in jobs all the time for less money. It’s not often this significant, but most of these guys are well paid compared to the rest of population. Yes, their career has a more limited time frame but they build networks and connections that give them employment opportunities beyond their playing careers. It’s not like they finish playing and are unemployable. Most still set themselves up very well
 

Tomthumb

Peter Fenwicke (45)
How much Wallabies' memorabilia can you lay down for a mortgage these days?

I'm not sure why you'd hang onto a Yen note to show your grandkids...
Not being able to service a mortgage while earning $450k? I'm sure Noah would have survived on that

I just don't think it's weird at all when people prioritize things like family and lifestyle over money. Especially when you will be earning good money regardless
 
Top