upthereds#!
Peter Johnson (47)
ahhh sorry didnt know it was a requirement, thought it was just a strongly recommended usage of the 23rd man.Not possible anymore...
ahhh sorry didnt know it was a requirement, thought it was just a strongly recommended usage of the 23rd man.Not possible anymore...
Not Cale, Swain, Gamble & ArnoldForward pack for 24
Front row, Bell, BPA, Tupoa
Locks Skelton and Swain
Backrow Valetine, Cale, McRight or Wright (if Schmidt wants a big 7)
Finishers AAA, Faessla, Arnold, Gamble, Swinton. assuming a 5/3 split
Love McRight as Captain, one of the very few we have who is a natural captain.You're all wrong. The team to beat the might of Georgia and Wales is as follows:
1. Bell
2. Faessler
3. Tupou
4. Frost
5. Skelton
6. Uru
7. McReight (c)
8. Valetini
9. White
10. Lolesio
11. Toole
12. Foketi
13. Ikitau
14. Petaia
15. Kellaway
The bench must contain 3 players who are proficient to cover the 3 front row spots. Who out of Arnold, Gamble and Swinton d7o you see playing LHP. Actually, I probably wouldn't mind seeing Swinton play half a game there but it might be the last we'll ever see him on a rugby ground.
Didn't know that but it's not at simple as you state although you must have 6 players in the 23 squad who can play front row as you stateThe bench must contain 3 players who are proficient to cover the 3 front row spots. Who out of Arnold, Gamble and Swinton d7o you see playing LHP. Actually, I probably wouldn't mind seeing Swinton play half a game there but it might be the last we'll ever see him on a rugby ground.
Didn't know that but it's not at simple as you state although you must have 6 players in the 23 squad who can play front row as you state
https://www.world.rugby/the-game/laws/clarification/2004/2/
Ruling of the designated members of the Rugby Committee
1. The Law states the number of suitably trained and experienced players in the front row who must come from the players who started the match or from the nominated replacements. Therefore designated front row players can come from either the bench or from the original starting fifteen. Replacements must also satisfy Law 3.5 (c) and (d).
NOTE (d) states (d) A replacement front-row player may start the match in another position. So presumably the loose head prop taken off could substitute a tighthead prop.
Yep Richie Arnold was up there in contention as Eddie’s worst call and that is saying somethingNot Cale, Swain, Gamble & Arnold
Yep Richie Arnold was up there in contention as Eddie’s worst call and that is saying something
I can’t believe people are already suggesting Lynagh for the wallabies, he cannot defend and his kicks go about 10 metres, needs a lot more time
He isn't crap, but he isn't ready either, he, at the moment, is Edmed standard but with more of an upsideNow I’m not saying Lynagh is ready for the Wallabies but to call him out on those two elements is just bizarre! I’d suggest those are two of his strengths, alongside his composure.
Neither players are ready, but at least Lynagh can kick. Edmed shouldn't be playing Super Rugby with his current kicking game.He isn't crap, but he isn't ready either, he, at the moment, is Edmed standard but with more of an upside
He is steadily looking better, every match.He isn't crap, but he isn't ready either, he, at the moment, is Edmed standard but with more of an upside
I was thinking of Rory but I guess you have a better player in mind?Yep Richie Arnold was up there in contention as Eddie’s worst call and that is saying something
I can’t believe people are already suggesting Lynagh for the wallabies, he cannot defend and his kicks go about 10 metres, needs a lot more time
You have to admit that my guesses are as good as anyone's here. My reasoning is I like a forward who shows some aggression as international tight 5 are no shrinking violets. Swinton and Swain over-egged it and have been brought into the controlled aggression line and I think that is excellent.Not Cale, Swain, Gamble & Arnold
And look who targeted him, one of the dirtiest locks in test rugby. This game is not for the faint hearted and if you think any tier one team has a tight five who are not too aggressive you are wrong.Swinton has improved his discipline, Swain still gives me the feeling he is one hot-head move away from a YC or RC, he still gets too caught up in the off-the-ball stuff, i think he is still a liability at test level and will be targeted by international teams as England did.
Christ! Ghost do you think that most forwards are there because they are non- aggressive, it is just that some are a bit dumb about how they use it and Swain and Swinton are learning how to guide it. If you don't have any aggression then you had better be in the Eales mould of talent or you are going to be run over - which has happened to our forwards more often than not in the last 20 years.Swain only got pinged once on the weekend but late hit someone else off the ball in the back and the hit to Tates head on the ground. He's just potentially given away 9 points and put the team a man down. He's a liability and I don't think he controls it when he sees a chance for it he does it and you can't get away with anything now.
Swinton is more likely to get himself in trouble due to tackle laws and his aggression in wanting to put a shot on. Far more coachable than what Swain gets himself caught up in.
Swain only got pinged once on the weekend but late hit someone else off the ball in the back and the hit to Tates head on the ground. He's just potentially given away 9 points and put the team a man down. He's a liability and I don't think he controls it when he sees a chance for it he does it and you can't get away with anything now.
Swinton is more likely to get himself in trouble due to tackle laws and his aggression in wanting to put a shot on. Far more coachable than what Swain gets himself caught up in.
getting baited into a YC at test level isn't aggression, it's dumbAnd look who targeted him, one of the dirtiest locks in test rugby. This game is not for the faint hearted and if you think any tier one team has a tight five who are not too aggressive you are wrong.