I think the glimpse we had of JOC (James O'Connor)-To'omua as a 10/12 was really enticing and I think it's the option Rennie will go with if both are fit. Experienced, skilful, good defenders, good kicking games. Combine that with White and you've got a really experienced backline taking shape.
Yes it was, almost as good as 10: Cooper; 12: To'omua for the very short period that was tested. Not as good though. You may be right about Rennie, we will see soon enough. I also agree that both JOC (James O'Connor) and To'omua can be trusted to run through to the RWC. And I agree completely on their form. It is great to see.
I'd still be playing Paisami at 12. And there are others knocking at that door.
It will come down to how Rennie wants to play and who best fits those intentions. I think that Paisami is a good fit for the "two big boppers" theory of centres. I also think he is shaping up nicely in improvement to offer some creativity if the intention is "in and out flyhalves". He is not likely to match To'omua any time before the RWC for a calm guiding head for steady leadership. I don't think there is lot between To'omua and Paisami in D, though I'll concede many will put To'omua ahead there.
Of course there is plenty of subtlety not covered in those obvious alternatives, and what I say about To'omua equally applies comparing Paisami to JOC (James O'Connor) at 12.
To me
9: White; 10: JOC (James O'Connor); 12: To'omua looks nothing as dynamic as
9 : White; 10: JOC (James O'Connor); 12: Paisami.
The difference its greater I think if you swap JOC (James O'Connor) and To'omua.
If Rennie is heading that way I'll be interested to see the game plan and strategy that goes with it.
EDIT: They are both great options. I do think that one is ahead tough.