Adam84
Rod McCall (65)
I’m not sure the Latham comparison is fair, besides physical attributes I don’t see the similarities.
Latham always had strong attacking prowess, he was just really inconsistent in his yearly years. High risk and high reward type player which doesn’t go well at test level, wasn’t till his later years where he developed the maturity and experience to deliver consistently.
Banks isn’t that kind of player, I think he is a relatively consistent player who plays to his strengths at Super Rugby level, running lines and support play. That’s just harder to translate at test level.
Latham always had strong attacking prowess, he was just really inconsistent in his yearly years. High risk and high reward type player which doesn’t go well at test level, wasn’t till his later years where he developed the maturity and experience to deliver consistently.
Banks isn’t that kind of player, I think he is a relatively consistent player who plays to his strengths at Super Rugby level, running lines and support play. That’s just harder to translate at test level.