Lorenzo
Colin Windon (37)
That may well be the case, that what will soon unfold was decided in late 2018 and into 2019 well before the RWC. Remarkably, the SMH online is reporting strongly that RA/Wallaby staff have already been told that Rennie is to arrive as Wallaby HC (which if true is btw something of a farce in itself given the RA CEO is running around saying no Wallaby HC decision is made and the matter is still under review).
The problem though, this perhaps being the case, is that we have zero visibility re:
- how was this decision made?- what decision processes were used?- what selection criteria were used?- what there or was there not a genuine global search for the best HC talent available?- why select from candidate HCs in early 2019 when clearly many of the best Test HCs would only get into serious discussion re role changes post RWC?
If we had an NZ-like set of HCs to choose from and/or our past decade + of choosing Wallaby HCs displayed excellent ARU/RA judgement by dint of the success and progress so created, then we could be more casual re the need for transparency re the above procedural questions. However, if in fact Rennie is already appointed it looks like we may never have answers to these questions, there will be zero transparency and clarity regarding how and why RA has made a vastly important and strategic decision. Hence we will not know if there was a sound and considered basis for the decision so made.
The stakes for getting the entire Wallaby coaching team right, or wrong, have never been higher.
it's obvious that another 4 year rolling set of mediocre (or worse) Wallaby outcomes will be not bad, but will be disastrous, for Australian rugby. A 15 year long cycle as it thus would be of ordinariness and low competence for fans, sponsors and media payers. Whomever is to blame, no elite sporting code can afford that length of sustained decline in all of income, prestige and credibility and still hope to prosper out the other side.
Remarkably, the SMH online is reporting strongly that RA/Wallaby staff have already been told that Rennie is to arrive as Wallaby HC (which if true is btw something of a farce in itself given the RA CEO is running around saying no Wallaby HC decision is made and the matter is still under review).
- why select from candidate HCs in early 2019 when clearly many of the best Test HCs would only get into serious discussion re role changes post RWC?
People in organisations often hear about negotiations that are in advanced stages but are nowhere near publicly announceable. Surely you'd agree that's fair enough? Like, if staff have been told it's gonna be Rennie because he is the guy they are talking to, and it's 90 percent likely, Castle still has to push the line that they are looking at a number of options because what if Rennie pulls out?
Can you imagine this forum if Castle announced a coach who then changed his mind before actually signing his deal? The server would be on fire.
Also, it might be that Rennie has negotiated timing of the announcement around when he wants to tell the Warriors about it.
I'd imagine the pool of potentially available coaches was fairly obvious 6 months ago and their agents would have been working hard to review possible next steps. RA could probably rule out all the current test coaches at that point, each for varying reasons.