What pains me the most is that the running rugby thing is a myth. It never existed. The teams whose success running rugby zealots hold out as evidence of its efficacy actually kicked when it was called for, and kicked well.
We've been swindled, and I'm actually rather angry about it. I'm no nostradamus, but I saw out performance in this WC coming years ago, as did many of us. Meanwhile, the coach is holding his line about the way he thinks Australians want the team to play.
Its an absolute shame what has happened to our game. Disgusting. Like, no one has died or anything, and it is just a game, but its been so negligently left to wither and it means so much to so many of us.
We need to make deeper changes than that, many more need to move on permanently. New broom
View attachment 11141
Really, really like your “Hooper, why not?”
.
Really, really like your “Hooper, why not?”
He is too good to leave out but we need a more balanced back row. And we have some very good talent coming through from u20.
I think it's a bit silly. Saying 'he's not a 7' and then putting him at 12?
He's the guy you build the team around at 7 and skipper. The bloke is a gun.
I really think the 'balance' in the back-row has been blown out of proportion too. If it's not hurting the set-piece then its fine, and it wasn't
AFL kicking and rugby kicking are not analogous in many ways at all. The situations are different, the ball is different. Most of the skilled work is short accurate kick-pass. The longer kicks are uncontested at the point of kick mostly. And looking around the world, most rugby nations develop a kicking game without the input of AFL. The fix lies in-house, not from out-sourcing per se. But it requires a change in mentality at all levels with regard to kicking.
I think there needs be a balance between out sourcing and looking in house.
Yes there there are some kicks which aren't related or suitable to rugby union, but then there are some which certainly are. What is relevant to rugby needs to be put into the context of the game and the different points during the game, focus on those skills which are relevant and ignore those which aren't. Yes AFL focuses on the short kicking game pretty heavily these days, but they are still the subject matter experts in this country on the torpedo kick, which is suitable to kicking for touch and a good skillset for the back 3.
With Arnold and Coleman moving on (As well as Chieka), I hope the LSL (Lukhan Salakaia-Loto) experiment at 6 is over. He was a good lock who I thought was our future but just looks lost and going through the motions. It's an indictment on the coaching IMO. Put him back at lock and play Samu or Dempsey at 6
What pains me the most is that the running rugby thing is a myth. It never existed. The teams whose success running rugby zealots hold out as evidence of its efficacy actually kicked when it was called for, and kicked well.
Cheika had plenty of odd selections over the years, but weirdly enough I thought the 23 in the England game was the right one.
Petaia was a genuinely good selection, and I thought Beale played well too. The Pooper did well at the breakdown, the only one he probably got wrong was Genia over White.
I don't think selection was why we lost, and I don't see the need for an incoming coach to tear up the team sheet and start again.
.
The worrying thing for me too about the guys leaving Arnold, Kerevi, and Latu at their peaks.. it's not so much them leaving but the fact they are also signing long-term deals for 3 years.
1 year deals seems to be a thing of the past.
Chip kick aside i presume.Cheika had plenty of odd selections over the years, but weirdly enough I thought the 23 in the England game was the right one.
Petaia was a genuinely good selection, and I thought Beale played well too. The Pooper did well at the breakdown, the only one he probably got wrong was Genia over White.
I don't think selection was why we lost, and I don't see the need for an incoming coach to tear up the team sheet and start again.
.