Try-ranosaurus Rex
Darby Loudon (17)
And Hooper has always fucked up every back row he's played in -- by not playing like a back rower.
H0OpEr iz a CENTeR
And Hooper has always fucked up every back row he's played in -- by not playing like a back rower.
I would be happy with that or for Samu and Wright to switch. Either will make a good impact when introduced.My backrow is Samu at 6 and Wilson at 8 with Wright on the bench.
Agree these have been Harry’s issues in the past , I’ve certainly seen evidence of it and probably like you, have been watching him since his schoolboy days.Harry Wilson does not play tight. He is rather inept and ineffective at the breakdown and tends to avoid it. When he plays in the backrow the team needs the other two backrowers to play tight. It worked really well this year with McReight and Wright in the Reds. But I have seen Wilson and his type of play exposed in previous years when there is only one backrower working “tight”.
I don’t think Wilson’s style of play compliments Hooper, so would surprise me if both were in the starting side.
Yeah, I think that was just Doran’s opinion.That article said that Valetini and Samu are favorites to partner Hooper in the backrow. I just can't see Valetini being there just yet, especially since he was on the bench for the Super Au final.
For mine the issue with LSL (Lukhan Salakaia-Loto) is that he's not quick enough to play 6 and we've seen him out run in open play multiple times at test level. He's also good at lock, which is a position we're a bit thin. I think he's a potentially good to excellent test lock and that's where he should play.
I think he is fast enough but regardless I’m suggesting he plays tight at 6 and only if they bring back other 2nd rows.
There are a few senior people in Australian Rugby who agree with your view of Lukhan. I'm not opposed to him him being trialled there long-term but it just seems less risky to play him in the row where he's been performing so well for the upcoming matches in NZ.I think he is fast enough but regardless I’m suggesting he plays tight at 6 and only if they bring back other 2nd rows.
There are a few senior people in Australian Rugby who agree with your view of Lukhan. I'm not opposed to him him being trialled there long-term but it just seems less risky to play him in the row where he's been performing so well for the upcoming matches in NZ.
No, I was not aware of that. Apologies for the error. It was just a joke following the post suggesting they'd kill themselves in RA headquarters, which was obviously a joke itself. I'll delete it.right i'll take a stab in the dark and say you didnt know someone killed themself live on tiktok last week
otherwise super shit joke...
Explain to me the difference between 6 and 8 besides where they pack in a scrum.
And yes I’m completely aware generally the two positions operate loose or tight but that’s not specifically set for 6 or 8.
He also played 6 in the u20s.