Not Valetini?
He will be there or there abouts but i dont think he makes the 23 right now. Even at the Brumbies Samu and McCaffrey would be ahead of him for 6/8.Valetini would have to be a strong contender for the squad and I wouldn't be at all unhappy if he made the 23.
There were plenty on here calling for it too don’t worry. When it happened it was Foleys fault for being at 12 that it didn’t go so well.In fairness, I haven’t seen much suggestion on the forum for MT at 10, it’s mainly been those on the front page banging their pots and pans for him.
On a wider note, the only good thing to come out of the Rebels loss was Naisarani 100% locking down the #8 gold jersey.
You don't get the big bucks for implementing a direct and abrasive defensive line.Not for the first time I am wondering why a player like Grey, who was so effective as a direct and abrasive defender, is complicating the hell out of things.
You don't get the big bucks for implementing a direct and abrasive defensive line.
It looks as though you have been doing nothing. No fancy positioning, swapping of players, and chess-like approaches to the skill.
Results are almost irrelevant to the importance of the process.
Simple isn't necessarily bad.There was a good article on the front page the other day about how we should use Kerevi to crash it up off the set-piece rather than trying to orchestrate complicated plays. As you say though, you don't get paid the big bucks to tell the 12 to crash it up.
Simple isn't necessarily bad.
You don't really see the Kiwi teams pull off complicated set piece plays that much. They just rely on exceptional basic skills.
The Waratahs against the Brumbies were a lesson in what not to do. The Waratahs tried and failed to be too deceptive and invariably a player caught the ball flat footed and was tackled immediately.
The Waratahs showed how well simple can unlock a good defence as well: the AAC (Adam Ashley-Cooper) try came from drawing defenders, running an angle, and making a short kick behind when the fullback was out of position. Simple, simple stuff.
Ryan Crotty isn't amazing because he's the best at the world in one thing. He's amazing because he's so good at every little basic Rugby thing.
Yes and no.There used to be an Australian franchise that was very good at this individual skill thing and every player knowing their role. They were called the Brumbies and they played some of the most successful and exciting footy of the era. It looks like they're starting to get back to that mode with McKellar, so it would be a very good idea IMHO to use the core of that squad in the Wallaby 23 this year.
Yes and no.
You'd expect a majority of the front 5 to be Brumbies. I have a suspicion only Samu from the backrow will be in with a shot, though (assuming Pocock is injured).I'd love to see McCaffrey given a shot but i don't think he will. Valetini will be in the squad but not the starting team.
I don't see the Brumbies backline forming the core of the team, besides TK walking into the 13 jersey.
The issue is that they are a good team as opposed to great individuals. In many positions there are better players from worse franchises. Hooper is better than Cusack and Samu, Genia and Phipps are better than Powell, Kerevi and Hunt are better than Simone, etc.
I think transplanting what makes the Brumbies work at the moment would take more than just transplanting their players into the Wallabies.
Who, i think, compliment TK and Kerevi well. In attack, at least.Fair enough. I think at least in the pack (which is where rugby games are won) you'd have a bunch of Brumbies present. I take your point in the backs and surely TK is a walk up start to partner Kerevi in the centres. They have both played so well this season that you'd base the backline around them. That will make the 10 and 15 jerseys interesting in terms of the skill sets, though I have a feeling that Cheika will pick Foley and Beale.