No O Franks, Thorn, Read or McCaw. That's a shit load of oomph missing from the boys up front and then there is no Carter to manage the ball emerging from a weakened platform, and no Conrad Smith to marshall the defense. On top of that, we can expect the selection of Woodcock, Dagg, Kahui and Toeava in their first big game coming back from injury.
I just can't see the ABs winning this game on the road; they're not playing Scotland here. Think Henry might be missing an opportunity to put the Boks and their confidence way down. It's not as if the likes of McCaw really needs the additional week of rest.
Smit and Steyn in doubt for Boks World Cup
Springbok captain John Smit and fullback Frans Steyn are in doubt for the world cup after they were both injured in South Africa's 9-14 loss to Australia in the TriNations.
The Springboks fielded their full strength team for the first time in almost two years but suffered a home loss taking them to a record of played three and lost three in the TriNations.
Fullback Frans Steyn kicked the first points of the match with a penalty but was forced from the field early in the second half with what appeared to be a pulled hamstring.
Springbok captain John Smit who's move in the match from Hooker to Tighthead prop proved again to be a failure injured ligaments in his arm and is also in doubt for the world cup.
An early but unconfirmed medical report said that Smit had torn ligaments in his arm.
Coaches have to try something.
3. Bj Botha
2. Bismarck - Assuming Smit is gone
1. CJ - need game time
Who the hell knows though?
Steyn is really no big loss, I think. He looked poorly conditioned and really contributed very little. Shame to see such a talented footballer being poorly guided in his decision making - going to fat in France can't be the best option for a young star like him.
Smit is only a loss in his captaincy (which is good). However, he is not so good a captain to go even close to covering his playing deficiency.
Considering Aus played like the B team and the Springboks like the C team, and the game like bag of mixed jelly beans, the All Blacks touring party are among friends.
Following Henry selection rationale, Guildford, Dagg, SBW will be dropped from backs regardless of the outcome of the game and Toeava, who essentially is a better player than these 3 players combined, will be selected along with Gear, Sivivatu, Jane, Kahui. Experience is key.
Of the forwards, Crockett, BFranks, Messam, Vito will go back to the farm and attend to the sheep.
Considering Aus played like the B team and the Springboks like the C team, and the game like bag of mixed jelly beans, the All Blacks touring party are among friends.
Following Henry selection rationale, Guildford, Dagg, SBW will be dropped from backs regardless of the outcome of the game and Toeava, who essentially is a better player than these 3 players combined, will be selected along with Gear, Sivivatu, Jane, Kahui. Experience is key.
Of the forwards, Crockett, BFranks, Messam, Vito will go back to the farm and attend to the sheep.
Yes opinion is building that SBW is taking a position amongst players who could play atleast another if required and at test standard. He is the least experienced rugby player and doesnt offer much in utility value on bench. While he could be the difference in a tight game, he hasn't yet shown this and maybe questioned to be called upon if such an occasion arises. Furthermore, the rest of his comrades have been selected for exactly that job description, "the difference".
Looking at the Wallabies equivalent, even McCabe can play wing if call upon, because thats what he is as opposed to Ant Fainga'a. But then again Ant Fainga'a has a better passing game, even perhaps a kicking game. Either way both will make way for Barnes who plays, 10, 12 at test level with ample caps and wins also with a proficiency at 15.