• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

Time to Complain to the ARU

Status
Not open for further replies.

SealClubber77

Stan Wickham (3)
I actually think Cooper would have been good last night.

I read an article by Spiro today that said a lot of Australian players hold the misconception that wet weather rugby requires extremely tight attacking lines, when really it doesn't (he didn't expand on what he thinks it does require, but in my experience it just needs slightly more depth to account for the half-second delay in handling, and calmer/deliberate support from the forwards).

Say what you like about Cooper, but he also has the minerals to throw it around a bit regardless of conditions. That probably would have been quite good for the Wallabies last night.

I feel that Quade would have been an absolutely mess in the weather. And the addition of rush defence and a possible hesitation to step after his injury could have seen the game take a whole different turn in Scotland's favour. I watched highlights of the world cup game against Ireland and his behind the back flick pass that was intercepted for an almost full field try made me cringe. So now i'm cringing at the thought of rush defence, wet weather and Quade Cooper. However his kicking game and kicking tactics would probably have been far better than Barnes'.
 

Bruce Ross

Ken Catchpole (46)
The ARU did NOT say it was 'making the best of a bad situation', they said something totally different, namely that 'we are doing the Scots a favour'. What an idiotic call, why should we risk additional injuries and the potential humiliation of a sequential loss to Scotland and poor preparation v Wales, just to do Scotland 'a favour'.

At times, RH, you can be a very harsh critic. I fear this may blind you to the good things that people and organisations do. I'm going to pose a question:

When was the last time that the ARU stated a clear objective and achieved it?

Do you get my point? Objective: To do the Scots a favour by scheduling a Test four days after Super 15 games. Result: Massive over-achievement. The Scots will be in our debt for years.

I believe our national body has just turned the corner. Let's have some positive reinforcement from you, RH. Join with me in giving them a robust pat on the back that will help inspire them to set further relatively easy objectives they are likely to meet. That will give them the confidence to move on to the tougher tasks like actually winning Tests.

I am told the Samoans are so thankful for the "favour" we did them last year they want to play us every year.
.
 

Antony

Alex Ross (28)
Do you get my point? Objective: To do the Scots a favour by scheduling a Test four days after Super 15 games. Result: Massive over-achievement. The Scots will be in our debt for years.

.

Fair point, though I'm not sure if you were being sarcastic.

The three main Southern Hemisphere countries are in the interesting position of having the bulk of the talent, but a minority of the votes at all relevant levels of the IRB. If there's any chance of turning this gratitude into south-friendly IRB votes the next time somebody proposes some dumbass law change, then the game was almost worth it from the ARU's perspective.

Admittedly, the pain of the loss was substantially/entirely numbed for me by virtue of being a New Zealander (I do like the Wallabies though - just to clear up that I'm not taking the piss).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top