• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

This is how you beat the All Blacks - by Knuckles Connolly

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hugh Jarse

Rocky Elsom (76)
From the SMH today:
http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-union/union-news/this-is-how-you-beat-the-all-blacks-20100828-13wu3.html

Another mention of Gaggerland in mainstream press!:cool::)

Former Wallabies coach John Connolly reveals the tactics that will win the Sydney Test for Australia.

Saturday, September 11, is a very important day in Australian rugby history. Australia, after nine consecutive losses to the All Blacks, are staring down the barrel of an unprecedented 10 straight defeats - one of our most humiliating records in more than 100 years of rugby.

A line has to be drawn.

Australia can win this match, but they will have to have a strong technical and tactical approach - the commitment is a given. You obviously need an ounce of luck, too - don't ever underestimate the value of that factor.

New Zealand off the field have a great internal structure to develop their players. They've also got three outstanding coaches and support staff who together develop strategies and tactics for the team, always staying ahead of the game.

When you're playing South Africa, Wales or England, you always have a sense of what to expect because each has a trademark style.

New Zealand, however, is a lot different. They're a bit more off the cuff and have many individual threats, built on some great athletes. But they also play to a structure.

Bob Dwyer's comments last week (on greenandgoldrugby.com) doubting that the Australian coaching staff ''have the perception, knowledge and courage to instruct and correct their 'elite' charges in the fundamentals of the game'' probably has some support from rugby followers. At the end of the Tri Nations there will be a review of the campaign, but it should be independent, not run by the ARU.

What the Kiwis have are three outstanding coaches, all proven international head coaches in their own right. That experience enables them to keep their opponents guessing.

We've seen two wonderful examples of this, one in Tokyo last October and another in the second half of the Christchurch game earlier this month, during which the coaches made clear tactical changes at half-time.

The All Blacks play instinctive rugby, which has been bred into them from a young age. Even though their Super 14 teams play very differently, their national coaches have managed to pull them all together and get them on the same page.

The philosophy is very much that they will play to the style that suits the players, and if you try to match them or imitate, they're comfortable with that. If you score two tries, they'll step it up and score five.

For Australia to get across the line, the game has to be divided into a number sections. Our starter plays - from the scrum, the lineout and the kick-off - have to be in top order.

In the scrum, the All Blacks push up and across and loose-head prop Tony Woodcock's side will always go forward. Australia failed to counter that in Christchurch. It's a technical issue that can be overcome. Since 2003, the scrum has been Australia's Achilles heel. The eye was taken off the ball at Super level. It's an area where we have improved but we want parity - and we'll accept parity against the Blacks and win the game in other areas.

The lineout - it's been our strength. Whenever the great teams of Australia have performed well, the lineout has been solid.

Hopefully this can be a weapon for us.

Against the All Blacks, we have to defend the middle and the back and be comfortable enough that if they win the ball at No.2, we can either sack it or drive them into the sideline. And even if they win the ball at No.2 you know they can't go wide because our back-rowers will be free to compete at the next breakdown.

This also has the advantage of taking Richie McCaw out of play at the first breakdown.

The lineout is an area in which I believe we can put tremendous pressure on them. We haven't done so in the last couple of Tests and it's something that has to be addressed.

The kick-offs - that's an area of major concern, as was the case in the game in Australia when we were firmly beaten. It improved in Christchurch, but it's an area that needs attention. Again, that's a coaching organisational issue.

The breakdown and the rolling mauls are huge weapons in the game. The maul is not only an attacking weapon, but it also commits the defence, potentially opening up the game for the backs. Used sparingly and with nous, we can make the most of this tactic.

Australia has to decide whether we use the English form of the driving maul, the French form where they split or the style we use in Australia, the roll. It's an area we haven't touched on too much this year and it's an area in which the All Blacks don't defend very effectively. It could be a huge plus if done properly. Again, that's a technical aspect.

At the breakdown, we saw a complete change in the All Blacks' strategy at Christchurch: they didn't compete at the breakdown in the second half. They were happy enough to put one or two in and put players across the field, back their defence and play field position.

I expect them this time to be a lot more competitive and work the breakdown very hard. It's an area in which Australia can't afford to over-commit. They have to be selective when they go in and can't fight over lost causes, which is something they've done in the past few Tests against the All Blacks. This is another major battleground for Australia.

The general-play attack was the big minus in the last game. The predictability, not using Will Genia to play off, with one pass from Matt Giteau into the midfield - a strategy we maintained for the whole game - became easy to defend against.

We need far more variation and have to be able to play off No.9 and No.s 10 and 12, or decide to go wide.

Genia has not been used effectively in the past two Tests because he has not had support runners around him. There needs to be more emphasis on trying to break the advantage line through footwork and running the correct lines. At the moment we're easy pickings for the defence.

Our defensive focus against the All Blacks has to be ''stop it at the source''. This puts a line in the sand for the defence and allows us to get organised.

They have many threats and are able to get momentum too easily.

There's no doubt that playing the All Blacks, you pay for your mistakes. You tend to lose games, not win them. But you have to take a very positive approach to the game. They will prey off your mistakes with all their brilliant individuals. They're the team to beat at the moment.

At least for the Wallabies' sake, there won't be any Dan Carter this time. But don't underestimate Aaron Cruden, he's a real attacking threat.

If we tick all the boxes, Australia are in with a very real chance.

Go the Knuckles: Connolly's top tips
THE SCRUM
It has improved but we need to get even better to achieve parity against the All Blacks. If we can hold our own here, we can win the game elsewhere.

THE LINEOUT
The Wallabies' traditional area of strength. This is where we must attack the All Blacks. Contest hard and force them to throw to No.2.

THE KICK-OFF
Much, much better in Christchurch compared to the Melbourne Test, but there is more room for improvement. Must be wary of the All Blacks mixing it up.

THE ROLLING MAUL
Vastly under-used so far. Very difficult to stop when implemented properly. Should be a weapon.

THE BREAKDOWN
A major battleground. The All Blacks will attack this area in Sydney and we must be selective when to join and when to hold back.

THE GENIA FACTOR
The halfback can only be effective if he has options. We must provide him with a number of runners.

BASH THEM IN DEFENCE
If the All Blacks start getting over the advantage line, they have the threats to cause mayhem.

HIS TEAM TO FACE NZ
15 Kurtley Beale

14 James O'Connor

13 Adam Ashley-Cooper

12 Matt Giteau

11 Drew Mitchell

10 Quade Cooper

9 Will Genia

8 Rocky Elsom

7 David Pocock

6 Dean Mumm

5 Nathan Sharpe

4 Mark Chisholm

3 Salesi Ma'afu

2 Stephen Moore

1 Benn Robinson

Reserves: Phil Waugh, Saia Fainga'a, Al Baxter, Richard Brown, Scott Higginbotham, Luke Burgess, Berrick Barnes
 

Gnostic

Mark Ella (57)
Agree with a lot of what he says but his team is unbalanced. Against the ABs I wouldn't go for a 5:2 split on the bench and I want more than 1 winger in the 22.
 

cyclopath

George Smith (75)
Staff member
Hmmm, Chisolm?? He has underwhelmed consistently.
Mumm at 6? Yet to see it work, although I can see why it sounded like a good idea in the past.
I agree with Gnostic - very unbalanced team and bench. Bench has no lock cover, there is no wing cover. Why have Brown at all - others are more versatile?
Hard to see that team being the answer.
 

Gnostic

Mark Ella (57)
Cyclo given his stated tactic of attacking the lineout as his main point of attack against the ABs (and I think he is totally wrong given their total avoidance to the lineout option this year) I can see why he has started with three locks. In that case you would see Higginbum come on early second half for Simmons and Mumm into second row and don't need a lock on the bench. This keeps up the pace of the game without losing height at the lineout. He (Connolly) used to do the same thing at Qld (and Dwyer did at the Wallabies a few times) with Eales playing from 8.

I think with lifting any more than 3 genuine jumpers is unecessary now and in any event does not given you any better pressure on the opposition throw.
 

cyclopath

George Smith (75)
Staff member
But I disagree playing Mumm at 6 to have "3 locks", especially since he has not impressed there. And Chisolm, despite his size, carries poorly. With his bench we could end up with the mighty midgets in the pack - that'd work well.
And say Sharpe goes off, who takes control? Would not want any of those calling the shots.
And, finally, the ABs seem to be travelling OK with the lineouts at the moment, so maybe not a weak point.
 

Gnostic

Mark Ella (57)
I agree totally. I was saying I can see what he is trying to do and how his selections would support that. It didn't really work for Qld or Oz when they tried it in the past and it wouldn't work now especially given the ABs avoid the lineout where thy can and do quick throws as much as possible and with the advent of lifting having more than three jumpers in a full lineout doesn't really offer that much more (on defence) given the draw backs in other areas.
 

DPK

Peter Sullivan (51)
Yeah...

No surprise for Connolly to come out and point out the obvious and actually contribute nothing...

And find time to throw Waugh into his squad...

I dunno about Waugh, but bloody hell we could've used some level heads in the last 20 last night...
 

Gnostic

Mark Ella (57)
The other big problem with Knuckles article is that he obviously is a bit out of touch with the players as both Baxter and Waugh are injured and haven't played for quite a while. We don't even have to touch on the issues with players out of position and the current issues much discussed elsewhere about whether some are even test standard.
 

Hugh Jarse

Rocky Elsom (76)
Where is Knuckles now?

Any clown can theorise, just look at the lot of us. What is he doing right now and is he producing any results.
 

Scarfman

Knitter of the Scarf
He's helping recruit for Melbourne. Which I reckon has gone pretty badly.

Deans and Connolly agree that J.Biebz should play on the wing. Anyone else agree?

Anyone?
 

cyclopath

George Smith (75)
Staff member
I know discussing who plays wing is generally regarded as fatuous, and I get that, but it shits me when they just bung anyone there who has talent and assumes they can play wing. Look at a proper winger (Mitchell) v JOCBeiberRabbitFLuffyBunny and it takes some specific skill and experience. There is some crossover with 13 and 15 to a degree - some players like Hynes / Turner / Shepherd have experience in different positions.
 

Thin Thighs

Ted Fahey (11)
Where is Knuckles now?

Any clown can theorise, just look at the lot of us. What is he doing right now and is he producing any results.

He's helping recruit for Melbourne. Which I reckon has gone pretty badly.

Deans and Connolly agree that J.Biebz should play on the wing. Anyone else agree?

Anyone?

If Knuckles is associated with Rebels, albeit at a low level, then one wonders at his motivation in writing the article. Also what was the motivation of the lazy sports editor who outsourced the column inches to a coach/subject matter expert at this level.

I know Knuckles is a past Wallaby coach and he has previously achieved a degree of success in the past, but is this not like asking Mick Jaggers views on how to make a successful gangsta rap song?

I feel that this is yet another case of the desert of quality and knowledgeable Australian Rugby media being exposed.

C'mon Greg Growden, and Spiro Zavos, give us something original, analytical, and inciteful. The rest of you supposed Rugby Journalists should also take note.

The editorial staff from NSW Shute Shield Rugby News are excluded from this gross generalisation of professional mediocracy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top