Gnostic
Mark Ella (57)
According to the commentators and some regular posters the performance of the Wallabies is not a coaching issue. I would point out the following in rebuttal:-
1) Poor core skill execution. How many poor passes, woeful running lines (Kurtley Beale running 25 metres across field at least 5 times perhaps one of the most over rated players ever in the Wallabies IMO), Coleman standing on the side of the maul - offside and doing Sweet FA. Folau kicking worse than a 10 year old - surprise, surprise when has he improved as a professional in this aspect of the game.
2) Chieka's reign has set many failure records - including some that Robbie Deans' teams managed that we never would have reasonably expected to get bettered. But no, we have now seen the achievement of the lowest ranking ever, conceded home series defeats to Ireland, England, record defeats to Scotland and now home to Argentina. On the last there is no doubt Argentina played well, but the Wallabies had so many chances and point 1 told the story.
If we approach Rugby as a business, it is failing, investors should be running for the exits, trouble is they would be in the log jam behind the fans, those who are trying to punch on with the players.
Now the argument is that Chieka and Co aren't really responsible for the performance of the players, now I dispute that in terms of skills and long term skill improvement but agree whole heartedly with regard to their actual application. If Chieka is to be held to account (and the support staff as well and they should be) more than a couple of players need to be as well. Incentive contracts need to be brought in and if some big names walk, fine it shows where their heads are and that is collecting a shit load of money, in actuality multiples of the median wage (in Hooper's case a life time of the median wage in 5 years) and they fail to perform, not in terms of win:loss but in skill development and application. The only other profession you can do that is as a Banker or Politician.
Finally not in defence of drunken idiots starting fights, there is no defence, but it is laughable that Gregan and Mitchell talk about that behaviour not being an appropriate forum to express the frustration (and disdain) a vast number of fans are obviously feeling (and I do agree - where the F%$#$ was the security that incident escalated over minutes it was not quick it should have been interrupted long before it got to where it did), but then the Three Amigos of fools in commentary come out with obvious derision for anybody expressing discontent on social media. So obviously they do not believe that any forum can be used to express valid frustration with the performance of these over paid show ponies and the positivity cheer squad in the commentary box.