wamberal
Phil Kearns (64)
The DP situation didn't go well. Trialed at 10 cause that's what the Wobs need. Reds fans were not impressed.
Oh, okay. Forget about it. Just maintain the current selection shambles.
The DP situation didn't go well. Trialed at 10 cause that's what the Wobs need. Reds fans were not impressed.
Cheika after Bled 1: “Our defence wasn’t good enough at all,” Cheika said. “It’s not attitude, it’s maybe just that little bit of doubt creeps in. When something goes against you early and you have been preparing a certain way, in creeps a little bit of doubt.”. Hooper: “At 50 points down, we had to believe in ourselves,” he said. “Some guys really stood up to the challenge. But it was a new defensive system and against a quality team we struggled. We’ll be looking to rectify that.” http://www.theaustralian.com.au/spo...s/news-story/7ca45ceb46be7bd0017da4cf624ed2d8
I’ll concede that I didn’t pick a very good example in my haste, barbarian is obviously a far superior googler to me. However, I picked it because he is basically saying ‘our defense was shite’, implying he was part of the problem. I don’t think he is explicitly blaming the players though, nor the system.KOB, in the first place there is a very heavy implication in Cheika's words that the players were at fault, not him nor Grey. Then, what new system is Hooper talking about? One that allows the opposition to have a two man overlap whenever they choose to run the ball wide? What's new about that?
I can see what you are doing so this isn’t a snipe, but if you are going to select an alternate team and then claim it to be superior, I think you at least need to select it from players who are actually available. If all those players were available the team that played Scotland would have been vastly different.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Can't defend at 13What qualitites does Kerevi possess that makes him a 12 as opposed to a 13?
So he could sit on the bench for another cup.. I just don't think he cracks the first team even though I think he shouldWhen does To'omua's contract finish in the UK? I would have my sights set on bringing him back if I was Rugby Australia. Probably the only useful thing the ARU/RA have done in recent memory has been getting Koroibete to come over, would be good if they could get To'omua home as well.
So he could sit on the bench for another cup.. I just don't think he cracks the first team even though I think he should
Sent from my HTC 2PS6200 using Tapatalk
I thought I heard he'd just renewed for 2 years
So since real rugby is over it's time for wild speculation:
I think by RWC19 we'll have the best front row in the world.
1. Sio
2. Uelese
3. Kepu
16. Slipper
17. Tatafu
18. AAA
I'm kinda hoping by then Mike Ala'alatoa will be in Aus vying for a spot
i suspect 5 A's will be playing for the AB's by then
I meant why would he come backI thought I heard he'd just renewed for 2 years
https://www.foxsports.com.au/rugby/...s/news-story/689e2ace40a537bc28f79a68d25bdc34
Don't know where I read it but I think the NZRU agreed not to pursue MA in exchange for the early release of Tyrrell Lomax. In any case it would be weird to wear a Wallabies jersey in public if you're hoping to play for the Allblacks.i suspect 5 A's will be playing for the AB's by then