TSR
Andrew Slack (58)
You must be a back.Honestly I'd only give him 4 or 5
Sent from my E5823 using Tapatalk
Replace prop for lock. http://wesclark.com/rrr/proptalk.html
You must be a back.Honestly I'd only give him 4 or 5
Sent from my E5823 using Tapatalk
A new book claims the two most important figures in New Zealand rugby's excellence were not coaches, they certainly weren't administrators and they might not have even been the best players. Dylan Cleaver runs the rule over the new theory.
on page 65 of The Captain Class: The hidden force that creates the world's greatest teams. The new book, researched and written by Wall Street Journal deputy editor of enterprise (and former sports editor) Sam Walker, identifies the on-field captain as the most important precursor to extraordinary success.
The American has identified what he believes are the 16 greatest teams of all times, using an involved formula that measured sustained, domineering excellence
Expecting the common denominator between the Tier One teams to be the usual suspects of superstar players, enlightened coaching and administration, or financial muscle, Walker was shocked to learn this wasn't always the case - in fact it usually wasn't.
"On a whim, I decided to make a list of the primary player-leaders of these 16 teams to see if any of their careers also served as bookends for their teams' Tier One performances," Walker wrote. "The results of this exercise stopped me cold. [Every team's dominant] performance corresponded in some way to the arrival and departure of one particular player. In fact, they all did. And with eerie regularity that person was, or would eventually become, the captain."
In the case of the two All Black teams the players were Wayne 'Buck' Shelford, who became captain after the 1987 World Cup victory until his controversial axing in 1990, and Richie McCaw, who was captain for the entirety of New Zealand's second spell of primacy until retiring in the immediate aftermath of consecutive World Cup victories.
I disagree, I think Carter is the bed rock of the Brumbies pack. You get the same solid consistent efforts from him every week and you need guys who just do that work and can be relied on.
I think that is why Douglas is in the training camp as well, these guys too often get overlooked for someone who drops in and out of games, but shows flashes of brilliance (like Dempsey and some of the young Qld locks) and then become invisible. We see a big run or hit and don't see the guys cleaning out or as with Douglas at the Tahs, shooting in defense and bashing 10s all game.
Far call. Carter fits that mould. Much like Simmons did. Although I'm not so sure Douglas does? He is far from consistent.
Far call. Carter fits that mould. Much like Simmons did. Although I'm not so sure Douglas does? He is far from consistent.
Douglas certainly doesn't fit the mould, his workrate and accuracy are average, and he doesn't have the same impact he once did. It's easy to be seen why he struggles for game time against Rodda and Tui.
Simmons and Carter are of the same mould, technically proficient locks who won't make the highlights reel.
Rory Arnold if fit should be in the squad before Douglas and Simmons. Building depth does not mean giving endless opportunities to those who have shown very little all year.
Set up squad competition with the young and hungry.
I think we are talking about the forth lock spot behind Arnold Coleman and Carter
I think we are talking about the forth lock spot behind Arnold Coleman and Carter
Is Naisarani qualified for Australia?
If so he should be in the squad
Most of us think the AB's will belt us in the RC.
If the Saffas play anything like the Lions did yesterday we are really looking down the barrel.