The legality of mauls.
Did anybody notice a maul that was strictly legal on the weekend? One of the keys to a good maul is depth, but how the ball carrier gets to the back of a maul that starts shallow is nearly always illegal.
Either the players joining in, especially the hooker who has thrown the ball to a lineout, join in front of the ball carrier - or less obviously, the ball carrier does not bind with a full arm and slides back behind players who joined legally.
In this backward transition the ball carriers are most often in contact with team mates only with the palms of their hands, or with sliding arms, yet the laws refer to binding, not just contact.
All teams do it. Have to.
Just as guilty are defenders who reach forward, grab a guy and lift themselves so their weight bears down on the attacking maul, and/or as the attackers get displaced by bearing their weight, they are able to swim through. Sometimes they even end up on top of the maul as the attackers drive through.
Swimming through around the side is noticeable but doing the same through the middle, putting some of your weight on top of opponents is not.
Just as you have to keep your weight on your feet at the ruck, so it should be during the maul; otherwise it is dangerous play.
.