Brendan Hume
Charlie Fox (21)
Many Rep teams do receive some funding. Qld Country (not the NRC version) have subsidised travel an accommodation and receive kit. Qld Junior State Champs is now a pooled fund so players are subsidising each other. This could be done much better, but I think it's fair that amateur rep is funded primarily by the sub-unions and players. I do think coaching and refereeing pathways should be improved though. These are resources used by the game, usually at no cost. Similarly club executives should have better access to networking and sharing of information particularly for volunteers. And the super franchises could use their resources to encourage excitement among player groups - wouldn't it be great if clubs could send a couple of players to Ballymore for two or three days of pre-season - even if it was at the players or clubs expense? This wouldn't necessarily cost anything, but generates incredible good will.Where is this place where the rep teams are even part-funded? Because around here, the rep teams fund themselves or are funded out of the competition they play in. I thought that was the way it was done everywhere?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk