Would anyone else like to post up the link?
@Scoey - understand your concerns. But to my mind, this isn't about it being "our" shield. Its about the hierarchy being reminded that we still give a shit and want these things to succeed, even if powers are working in the background to make sure they don't.
well said Pfitz. This has always been about the intent and the outcome. That remains with this result. I think we should all be stoked that this comes off and try not to get too caught up in some of the smaller variances. In saying that, I was a little miffed that that went to the Roar, however Brett McKay is a quality individual and has done as much as GAGR has for the NRC, as an individual he has done more than anyone. Whittaker no doubt was just trying to provide some further info for him.
However, what I will say is this:
- I doubt it will be the Shawn Mackay Shield for the reasons we came up with here. There are already plenty of those. We brainstormed a few ideas with the ARU and the broadcasters and I reckon we've come up with a pretty decent name at the moment, which isn't appropriate to share just yet.
- I don't think Brisbane will be the holders, for the same reasons described in this thread with the first likely challenge being the 2nd round game when inaugural holders Melbourne face Brisbane.
- the process for challenge and wins will be worked out but I put forward the work we have done here and I'd suspect that is what will be adopted. Perhaps.
- I have a phone hook up with the ARU later this morning to discuss this all so will provide an update later.