Ah, the machinations of French Rugby. What people don’t realise is that ‘professional’ is a misnomer when it comes to League because it was the true amateur game in France. Any money in Rugby was in the hands of Union. Remember that the French were booted out of the 5 Nations due to professionalism and violence with a number of players dying.
Had Jo Maso been born English he would have been barred from playing Union because he started out playing League for Perpignan and played for France at League (under 24’s). And that goes for others as well. The French never had that problem with the gangway between the codes in signing League players; and if you wanted to get on in life it was better to play Union because they always guaranteed better jobs and ‘expenses’. The French attitude was that ‘professional’ meant that was your full time occupation, so by definition both codes were ‘amateur’.
Insofar as Vichy was concerned, the only sport that was banned was League, although Cycling escaped by the skin of its teeth in being allowed to be participated in, and was by far the most popular sport in France in those days. Note also that until the 80’s the French govt barred League from using the word Rugby. It had to be called ‘Jeu a Treize’.
Professionalism was the excuse used by the English (RFU) for the sport being dominated by the Northern Union clubs whereby most of the players were working class in the days when they worked a 6 day week. The proposal to compensate players for the lost time was the schism whereby League came about. The ‘Establishment’ did everything it could to destroy the game. It was banned in the Armed Forces, grammar schools and Uni’s, but the sporting apartheid was eventually kicked in to touch when MP (Moana Pasifika)’s started giving the Union establishment a hard time and 1995 changed everything: the sham was over.
League players in England always had jobs because the win / lose bonuses never made anyone rich enough only to play the game. That only