Geeves
A great post mate - enjoyed it.
I will always be a Tahs fan and go to their games but there was a point this year when after several years of attending games, including those coached by Link, I asked myself why I bothered. Even if they won, most of the games were dreary and fellows like Tuqiri and Turner weren't getting the ball.
This year I was looking forward more to watching the Reds play on TV than the Tahs on TV when they were away. The Reds played with a joy that lifted their fans but it also lifted rugby heads like myself.
I think that it may have given a bit of joy to the IRB alickadoos also. Defence had evolved so well, including the ability to slow he ball that teams were too scared to hold the ball. The ball was hoisted a lot and the ping pong virus infected the game. The IRB imprimatur that refs should enforce the breakdown laws as they were written seemed good in theory but dodgy because referees had bad habits, but they worked a treat.
The Queensland Reds in the Super14 and to a lesser extent, the Northampton Saints and Bath in the GP ***, have shown that enforcing the laws at the breakdown resulted in better quality ball and the expansive benefits that go with that. It helped having expansive players such as Genia and Cooper at the Reds and Foden and Ashton at the Saints and those teams blossomed under the new paradigm.
Queensland won more matches that were winnable than in previous years but all their lost games except in Canberra, were winnable, and they damn near got rolled by the Clan last weekend. That comes from having more inexperienced players than the average Super14 team but if there is one thing that Link will be thinking of for next year it is finishing games off.
I have digressed - thank you McKenzie for letting your young lads express themselves and lifting the hearts of Australian rugby tragics.
[ *** The European refs did not observe the law crackdown uniformly or constantly. Had Northamptom played in the Super14 under SH refs they would have made their mark.]