Pfitzy
Nathan Sharpe (72)
Heard it here first team. Our esteemed subbies exec director is trying to get finals series changed from top 6 to top 4. Hard sell considering its been top 6 all year.
Ah, the rumour mill - just enough truth to spark something, without enough veracity to stop a campfire becoming a bushfire.
As someone who was at the Div 4 meeting last night, let me give some context: the discussion we had around Top 4 or 6 centred mostly around 2nd Grade (tho both were discussed).
With both Raptors and Canterbury announcing they would drop a side, Grose Cup becomes 10 teams. Having a 6-from-10 finals there almost becomes SRP (Super Rugby Pacific) where 8 of the 12 teams played finals. However, we were 11 clubs to start, so it isn't that much different in my opinion. Once Raptors came back in it evened it up, sure.
The second consideration is logistics:
Top 4 is a finals series you could do in 2-3 weeks depending on how you want to cut it. Only need 2 fields in week 1.
WIth 6 teams you're at 3 weeks minimum and you need 2 fields for the first 2 weeks.
The general consensus from clubs who attended seemed to be we should stick with Top 6 as advertised. The risk otherwise is a dropoff in player interest for those clubs just outside the finals, in a season that has already presented challenges. Similarly, those clubs in 5th and 6th have something to fight for, and there are several with game(s) in hand.
Not everyone is out of the race yet, and regardless of any likely beating a side might get in Week 1 of the finals, just making finals is a marker clubs can use each year to aim at.
Yes, including my club who might be able to get on a hot streak in the last few weeks and scrape in