The relevance is he's a big bastard, not a scrawny half back.
There is an easy solution.. Don't king hit people when they have their back turned and you won't get suspended.
I really hope that if one of your players required surgery after being king hit and you had it on film you would submit it to the judiciary.
Okay, look, it's been two years since I've seen the vision, but that isn't how I remember it, however I could very well be wrong. From memory it was on the edge of the ruck and I've just been reminded by a mate from the club that the punch was allegedly in response to something racial that was said.
I doubt that if the incident was exactly as you describe, he would only have received 4 weeks once subbies had seen the footage? You can get more for a lifting tackle.
Show-n-go - The bloke had a broken nose? He wasn't hit in the back of the head.
Obviously I disagree with the punch - as I have said several times. He deserved to be sent off. absolutely. He even deserved to be suspended. I am not disputing this AT ALL. What I disagree with is the method by which he came to be suspended....
This whole thing is insanely out of hand. I was trying to make a point about footage and the basic principle of a competing team not being allowed to act as a judiciary..... I would have thought that was a fairly basic concept.. but if its going to be blown up into something I don't think is fair, I will say so.
I'm interested - Do Iggies actually film every game or only when they play Brothers?